Darrin J. Lee, Sung-Bum Kim, Philip Rosenthal, Ripul R. Panchal, Kee D. Kim. Stereotactic guidance for navigated percutaneous sacroiliac joint fusion[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2016, 30(2): 162-167. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.30.20150090
Citation:
Darrin J. Lee, Sung-Bum Kim, Philip Rosenthal, Ripul R. Panchal, Kee D. Kim. Stereotactic guidance for navigated percutaneous sacroiliac joint fusion[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2016, 30(2): 162-167. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.30.20150090
Darrin J. Lee, Sung-Bum Kim, Philip Rosenthal, Ripul R. Panchal, Kee D. Kim. Stereotactic guidance for navigated percutaneous sacroiliac joint fusion[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2016, 30(2): 162-167. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.30.20150090
Citation:
Darrin J. Lee, Sung-Bum Kim, Philip Rosenthal, Ripul R. Panchal, Kee D. Kim. Stereotactic guidance for navigated percutaneous sacroiliac joint fusion[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2016, 30(2): 162-167. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.30.20150090
Arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) for surgical treatment of SIJ dysfunction has regained interest among spine specialists. Current techniques described in the literature most often utilize intraoperative fluoroscopy to aid in implant placement; however, image guidance for SIJ fusion may allow for minimally invasive percutaneous instrumentation with more precise implant placement. In the following cases, we performed percutaneous stereotactic navigated sacroiliac instrumentation using O-arm? multidimensional surgical imaging with StealthStation? navigation (Medtronic, Inc. Minneapolis, MN). Patients were positioned prone and an image-guidance reference frame was placed contralateral to the surgical site. O-arm? integrated with StealthStation? allowed immediate autoregistration.The skin incision was planned with an image-guidance probe. An image-guided awl, drill and tap were utilized to choose a starting point and trajectory. Threaded titanium cage(s) packed with autograft and/or allograft were then placed. O-arm? image-guidance allowed for implant placement in the SIJ with a small skin incision.However, we could not track the cage depth position with our current system, and in one patient, the SIJ cage had to be revised secondary to the anterior breach of sacrum.
Zuo D, Sun M, Mu H, et al. O-arm-guided percutaneous microwave ablation and cementoplasty for the treatment of pelvic acetabulum bone metastasis. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 929044.
DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.929044
2.
Strand N, J M, Tieppo Francio V, et al. Advances in Pain Medicine: a Review of New Technologies. Curr Pain Headache Rep, 2022, 26(8): 605-616.
DOI:10.1007/s11916-022-01062-6
3.
Sarkar M, Maalouly J, Ruparel S, et al. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Fusion Rates and Clinical Improvement Using Minimally Invasive Approach and Intraoperative Navigation and Robotic Guidance. Asian Spine J, 2022, 16(6): 882-889.
DOI:10.31616/asj.2021.0058
4.
Triano M, Fayed I, Sandhu FA. Robot-assisted revision of sacroiliac joint fusion using a triangular titanium implant in an S2-alar-iliac trajectory: illustrative case. J Neurosurg Case Lessons, 2021, 2(1): CASE2169.
DOI:10.3171/CASE2169
5.
Piche JD, Muscatelli SR, Waheed MA, et al. Robotic navigation system utilization for percutaneous sacroiliac screw placement: surgical setup and technique. J Spine Surg, 2021, 7(2): 197-203.
DOI:10.21037/jss-20-681
6.
Cleveland AW 3rd, Nhan DT, Akiyama M, et al. Mini-open sacroiliac joint fusion with direct bone grafting and minimally invasive fixation using intraoperative navigation. J Spine Surg, 2019, 5(1): 31-37.
DOI:10.21037/jss.2019.01.04