
Citation: | Yamei Gao, Shaohu Huo, Chao Chen, Shiyu Du, Ruiyuan Xia, Jian Liu, Dandan Chen, Ziyue Diao, Xin Han, Zhiqiang Yin. Gold nanorods as biocompatible nano-agents for the enhanced photothermal therapy in skin disorders[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2025, 39(1): 1-17. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.38.20240119 |
Rod-shaped gold nanomaterials, known as gold nanorods (GNRs), may undergo specific surface modification, because of their straightforward surface chemistry. This feature makes them appropriate for use as functional and biocompatible nano-formulations. By optimizing the absorption of longitudinally localized surface plasmon resonance in the near-infrared region, which corresponds to the near-infrared bio-tissue window, GNRs with appropriate modifications may improve the results of photothermal treatment (PTT). In dermatology, potential noninvasive uses of GNRs to enhance wound healing, manage infections, combat cutaneous malignancies, and remodel skin tissues via PTT have attracted research attention in recent years. The review discussed the basic properties of GNRs, such as their shape, size, optical performance, photothermal efficiency, and metabolism. Then, the disadvantages of using these particles in photodynamic therapy are highlighted. Next, biological applications of GNRs-based PTT are explored in detail. Finally, the limitations and future perspectives of this research are addressed, providing a comprehensive perspective on the potential GNRs with PTT.
Approximately 70% of people worldwide suffer from skin illnesses[1], with dermatosis being a major health issue that needs effective treatment. Conditions such as psoriasis and other inflammatory skin illnesses, wound healing, skin cancer, and skin infections are among the most common dermatological issues. In the treatment of dermatological problems, the transdermal delivery of medication is an appropriate method for topical administration[2]. Unfortunately, therapeutic effects of the medications that penetrate the skin to reach the epidermis or the dermis are frequently insufficient, because of the restricted permeability of pharmaceuticals into the skin, particularly the stratum corneum[3–4]. To address this issue, scientists have tried to treat skin conditions with nanotechnology. The goal of developing and producing nanostructures is to outperform the existing conventional formulations[5].
Light can easily penetrate the skin, making it a useful tool in the treatment of skin diseases. Many ailments, such as inflammatory skin conditions, cutaneous melanoma, tissue regeneration, and infection control, are extensively treated with light technology[6]. Photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic treatment (PDT) are prominently used in the treatment of these dermatological diseases, which have cosmetic benefits related to the improvement in the overall appearance of the affected area[7–8]. PDT plays a role in immune regulation, anti-inflammatory, and anti-bactericidal effects by producing reactive oxygen species. There are several challenges related to PDT, with the main ones being pain, erythema, insufficient delivery of the photosensitizer, and varying clinical response rates[9]. By comparison, PTT uses localized hyperthermia under optical radiation to cause the death of diseased cells or tissues[10].
Depending on the required penetration depth, various types of light are employed. Near-infrared (NIR) light, which has a wavelength between 750 and
Among the different types of gold nanoparticles, GNRs become a prospective and low-impact alternative for topical medications because of their strong biocompatibility and functionality. GNRs, with a longitudinal LSPR in the NIR region and an ability to convert the energy of the absorbed NIR light into heat, are proper agents for both the induction of PTT and the design of the NIR radiation-responsive drug release systems. The PTT efficiency of GNRs in dermatological applications is attributed to several positive characteristics. First, the seed-mediated growth way makes it easy to create GNRs that have dimensions of around 80 nm in length and 20 nm in width[16]. Compared with the production process of other Au nanoparticles (NPs), this method is simpler[17–19]. Next, through manipulation of the aspect ratio (AR, length/width), GNRs provide an exceptional optical tunability, resulting in an improved photothermal efficiency at certain light frequencies[20]. Some investigators have demonstrated the use of hydroquinone to synthesize GNRs with LSPR up to
GNRs also have significant advantages over other photothermal agents. As for immunoregulation-associated nanofibers, the potential mechanism of interaction between their construction and cell behavior is not clearly understood, which can be evaluated in the process of complicated immunotherapeutic research in the future[28]. Chen et al[29] proposed a temperature-controlling phase change fiber scaffold composed of hollow carbon fibers loaded with lauric acid as a phase change material, which might store and release any surplus heat transformed from NIR through the reversible solid-liquid transition course of the phase change material; although this nanomaterial played an important role in mild photothermal combined with chemotherapy for cancer, its range of applications was relatively narrow because of the difficulty in attaching ligands to the surface. In addition, Yang et al[30] designed a kind of NIR-Ⅱ-triggered chitosan composite nanofiber embedded with CuSe nanoparticles, which might be applied in craniotomy of glioblastoma and simultaneously achieve a rapid hemostasis (< 8 s), an efficient superbug-killing rate (> 99%), and a complete removal of residual cancer cells; however, the synthesis method, the green electrospinning method they used, had a comparatively low productivity compared with the production efficiency of GNRs-related nanomaterials. In recent years, multimodal theranostic nanoplatforms have been extensively studied, such as phytic acid (PA)-Cu2+ framework/copper sulfide (Cu2-xS) nanocompounds (PA-Cu/Cu2-xS NPs) that may enhance multimodal mild-temperature photothermal therapy/chemodynamic therapy/chemotherapy by decreasing the overexpressed heat shock proteins (HSPs), and Ce6@CuS-Pt/polyethylene glycol (PEG) NPs decorated with Pt NPs as a nanozyme, showing an excellent photothermal conversion efficiency (43.08%), well singlet oxygen (1O2) production capacity, favorable physiological stability, and perfect catalytic properties[31–32]. However, both PA and nanozyme are expensive to manufacture and purify, complicated to operate, and sensitive to environmental conditions. Lastly, in the area of ferroelectric-photoexcited nanofiber membranes, Wang et al[33] proposed an antibacterial nanofiber membrane [polyvinylidene fluoride/Bi4Ti3O12/Ti3C2Tx (PVDF/BTO/Ti3C2Tx)] that exhibited an excellent photothermal effect and ferroelectric polarization, yet the pore diameter of the resulting membranes was sensitive to pressure, making it difficult to synthesize. Herein, the present review first describes the basic and optical properties of GNRs and presents their clinical application and treatment of GNRs PTT. As shown in Fig. 1, we provide the insight into GNR-based PTT and its combinatorial applications in the treatment of various skin diseases, including superficial tumors, wound healing, skin injury, and skin inflammation[34–41]. Finally, we have summarized that GNRs should possess lower toxicity, higher yield, good monodispersity, as well as specific sizes, shapes, and aspect ratios (ARs) to achieve ideal optical properties to meet the needs for dermatosis therapy, which provides a more in-depth perspective on the potential applications of GNRs in the treatment of skin diseases.
Micellar cationic amphiphile solutions are often used for the synthesis of GNRs. An electrochemical synthesis approach with different average ARs for GNR production in CTAB solutions was developed in 1997[42–43]. In 2002, Kim et al[44] introduced a different method for creating GNRs termed photochemical synthesis, which was the process of attaching photochemically reduced gold ions to a micellar solution. Both methods enable the creation of GNRs with various ARs. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and substantial electron extinction are caused by the collective oscillation of GNR surface electrons when exposed to particular light wavelengths. Two bands of SPR are visible in GNRs. The first band, referred to as the transverse band, exhibits a slight extinction in visible light and is not affected by the ARs of the nanoparticles. Its wavelength range is between 500 and 550 nm. The longitudinal band, which is the second band that primarily dominates the absorption spectra of GNRs, is stronger and located in the NIR region of the spectrum[45]. Raising the ARs of GNRs results in a red shift and an increase in the wavelength of longitudinal band[46]. To meet the optical absorption criteria for PTT, this AR may be used to precisely adjust the maximum SPR and the longitudinal resonance of GNRs.
Fewer GNRs are absorbed by cells, compared with gold nanoparticles shaped like spheres (AuNSPs) or cages (AuNCs). More receptors are needed in the longitudinal direction of GNRs to start cellular absorption, because AuNSPs and AuNCs have lower ARs (approximately 1) than nanorods (approximately 2–4). CTAB is frequently used as a surfactant in the synthesis of GNRs that follow the seed growth method to stabilize the particles and prevent them from aggregating. The electropositive zeta potential of GNRs is formed by the residual CTA+ that covers their surface. CTA+ enhances cellular absorption more effectively through ionic interactions, because of the negative potential on the surface of cell membranes. The first investigation using GNRs was conducted by Du et al[47], who used an NIR laser in an in-vitro PTT study, demonstrating a notable photothermal effect and the ability of GNRs to detect cancer tissues and cells. In a recent study on the PTT characteristics of GNRs of different sizes, Morales-Dalmau et al[48] have shown that the cytotoxicity of GNRs is correlated with particle size but not as much with the precise quantity of GNRs.
Currently, GNRs used for PTT are most likely 80 nm long and 20 nm wide, with longitudinal plasmon resonance occurring at or around 800 nm. Images captured using a scanning electron microscope revealed that the GNRs have a rod-like structure (Fig. 2). According to an earlier theoretical study by Jain et al[49–50], plasmonic absorption becomes increasingly significant as the size of the nanoparticle decreases. In particular, as the GNRs increase in size, the extinction of the particles and the scattering contribution also increase. This demonstrates that when particle size decreases, the absorption/scattering ratio rises, enabling an improved photothermal conversion and a raised PTT efficiency. Manivasagan et al[51] demonstrated that the synthesized multidentate chitosan oligosaccharide-modified GNRs (CO-GNRs) were a novel treatment for PTT of cancer cells, because of their significant absorption in the NIR spectrum, superior thermostability, and biocompatibility. Using field emission transmission electron microscopy, the average diameter and length of GNRs were measured to be 5.4 (± 3.5) nm and 24 (± 4.2) nm, respectively. Furthermore, the average diameter and length of the CO-GNRs were 6.8 (± 1.7) nm and 26 (± 3.1) nm, respectively. CO-GNRs showed a high NIR absorption peak at 838 nm. After 5 min of NIR laser irradiation at 2 W/cm2, the temperature of CO-GNRs rapidly rose to 52.6 ℃. The CO-GNRs showed therapeutic activity in vitro for the ablation of breast cancer cells with low cytotoxicity. After PTT with CO-GNRs (25 μg/mL) under laser irradiation, tumors in tumor-bearing animals were destroyed and did not recur.
Metallic particles exhibit a phenomenon known as LSPR when they are reduced to a size comparable to or smaller than the electronic mean free path, which is approximately 100 nm[55]. This phenomenon occurs when a plasmonic nanoscale metallic particle is exposed to electromagnetic radiation. The oscillating electromagnetic field acts on the conduction band electrons of the particles. Charge separation on the particle results from this interaction, which makes the electrons oscillate coherently with the applied field. Plasmon resonance is the greatest amplitude of oscillation at a particular frequency[56]. Strong absorption and scattering of the incident beam are caused by this resonance, particularly when Au-containing metallic particles are involved[57]. This resonance gives the GNRs their special capacity for photothermia. The metallic particle's size, shape, charge density, and element are among its physical characteristics that determine the strength of the LSPR band and the peak absorption wavelength. Gustav Mie initially accounted for these correlations in the early 1900s[58–61]. To achieve the optimal wavelengths for their LSPR, GNRs may be fine-tuned by modifying synthesis parameters, such as chemical concentrations of the reagent. Since only certain light wavelengths, particularly in the NIR window, are appropriate for therapy, this tunability is essential for PTT[62]. The range of light wavelengths that may thoroughly penetrate tissue is known as the NIR, and it extends from around 700 nm to
The longitudinal and transverse peaks are the two distinct windows of extinction, which define the intrinsic anisotropy of GNRs. Electron oscillations along the long axis are matched by the longitudinal peak, while those along the short axis are matched by the transverse peak (Fig. 3). Disparate ARs may be obtained by varying the length of the GNRs, which shifts the UV-visible spectra[67]. The transverse absorption band remains relatively constant, while surface plasmon oscillation causes an absorption band with a longer and redshifted wavelength as the ARs increase. Gan's theory clearly explains the optical behavior underlying these phenomena[68]. By altering the concentration of silver nitrate in the growth fluid, the seed-mediated synthesis method allows for the adjustment of the optical range of GNRs[45,69]. GNRs with greater ARs are formed, when silver nitrate concentrations increase.
The photothermal conversion property of GNRs, which mainly depends on their concentration, shape, LSPR, etc., is an important characteristic that helps in the treatment mechanism. As shown in Fig. 4A, when the light at a specific wavelength is absorbed by metal-based nanoparticles, the collective oscillation of the electron cloud at the surface may convert light energy into heat for PTT. Because of this ability, GNRs may be applied to killing cells in areas exposed to NIR irradiation[71]. The gold nanomaterials, using a phonon-united course, convert the NIR into thermal energy, as shown in Fig. 4B. Specifically, the energy from the incident wave may transmit to GNRs in the form of free electrons as soon as it has been absorbed[72]. The whole process of this phenomenon occurs in picoseconds, with hundreds of picoseconds spent transferring heat to the adjacent medium. In 2018, Kim et al[73] found that GNRs exhibited the best photothermal conversion property, when the wavelength of the longitudinal plasma resonance λ matched that of the incident laser λ. On the other hand, because of the scattering capability of gold nanoparticles, the larger their size, the lower their photothermal conversion efficiency[74]. Furthermore, the concentration of GNRs is correlated with the photothermal conversion.
Regarding dermatological treatment, there has been an increasing interest in the photothermal effect of GNRs. Numerous studies have shown the effectiveness of various modified or coated GNRs in treating cutaneous tumors, healing wounds, preventing infections, and managing psoriasis. GNRs produce heat and eliminate over-proliferating keratinocytes and cancer cells, when subjected to light or laser light. Moreover, GNRs may function as a platform for achieving multimodality through pharmacological or gene combinations.
Malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma are examples of superficial skin malignancies that are both common and seriously dangerous to people's health[75]. Currently, the most widely used anti-cancer treatments include chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical treatment. However, these treatments have certain drawbacks, including a high rate of recurrence, a poor rate of curative efficacy, significant adverse effects, and poor patient compliance. GNR-mediated phototherapy and combination treatment have emerged as replacement treatments to overcome these drawbacks. Specific details are presented in Table 1.
Materials | Evaluation models | Key findings | Ref. |
Platelet-facilitated photothermal tumor therapy | In vitro and in vivo using the method of electroporation | This therapy could effectively inhibit the growth of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. | [78] |
Nanoparticles directed by ShTxB as a local treatment | Preclinical murine models and patient biopsy cells | This research showed an effective treatment for aggressive localized cancer. | [81] |
Photothermal effects mediated by EGFRmAb-GNRs | In an animal model of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma | The EGFRmAb combined with GNRs achieved a photothermal effect in the treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. | [82] |
Load the photosensitizer gold nanoparticles cage for immunogenic phototherapy of aggressive melanoma | In B16-F10 cells and in C57BL/6 female mice | This material may destroy the main cancer with NIR irradiation, and clear away the antitumor immunity to inhibit the metastasis and recurrence as well. | [83] |
Lasers or illuminating light may be used to eliminate tumors or destroy cancer cells, when GNRs build up in them. A cancer treatment strategy called platelet-facilitated photothermal tumor therapy (PLT-PTT) was proposed by Rao et al[78] in 2017. Platelets (PLTs) were used in this treatment to improve the effects of PTT by delivering photothermal agents to tumor tissues. Using the Tgfbr1/Pten conditional knockout (2cKO) mouse model, they observed that the administration of PLT-GNRs and the localizing laser irradiation effectively inhibited the growth of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. This demonstrates the unique advantages of PLT-PTT in the management of cancer. In terms of the targeted therapy, Jin et al[79] believed that the use of a multifunctional peptide coating mainly composed of, from the inside out, a mitochondrial targeting segment, a cathepsin B-responsive segment, and a zwitterionic antifouling segment might increase the ability of tumor recognition. Therefore, the multifunctional peptide (CC-EKEK-V-FrFKFrFK-V-GFLG-V-EKEKEKEKEKEK) was used to modify GNRs, a classical photothermal agent, to construct a multifunctional therapeutic nanoplatform (GNR@FrFK-GFLG-EK) for PTT and mitochondrial targeting. Meanwhile, Ding et al[80] proposed a kind of tumor microenvironment-responsive multifunctional peptide (Tat-R-EK) coated ultrasmall gold nanoparticles that might effectively solve the short circulation half-life, non-specific distribution, slow clearance, and low radio-sensitizing effect. Additionally, Navarro-Palomares et al[81] described the effective conjugation of a high-affinity protein-ligand functional group (Shiga Toxin-B; ShTxB) with GNR in 2022. They discovered that the ShTxB-functionalized GNRs were efficiently retrotranslocated to cytoplasms of globotriaosylceramide (GB3)-positive cells. Further laser irradiation at the SPR wavelength of the longitudinally positioned GNRs stimulated the death of the targeted tumor cells. Specifically, more than half of GB3-positive neoplastic cells that contained GNR@SiO2@ShTxB were eliminated after just 3 min of NIR radiation, while a longer laser exposure (10 min) killed 80% of these cells[81]. In the same year, Hai et al[82] showed that the conjugates of epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody (EGFRmAb) and GNRs selectively entered squamous cancer cells, and exerted the photothermal effect, causing cancer cell death and inhibiting the proliferation of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells. Furthermore, Xie et al[83] designed a multifunctional nanoplatform MLI-AuNCs, in which additive monophosphoryl lipid A and sensitizer indocyanine green were sheltered and co-transferred to the tumors by the thermosensitive lipid-enveloped AuNCs, which exhibited remarkable NIR-triggered cell-killing ability.
Because wound healing has such a large impact on human health, the interest in this area has lately surged. Wounds provide a favorable environment for microbial growth, thus there is an increased risk of skin infection during the healing process[84]. Creating efficient treatment plans that encourage wound healing, restore skin function, and avert complications is crucial to solving this problem[85]. GNRs, which are detailed in Table 2, have attracted a significant interest as a possible wound-repairing agent and have demonstrated promise in some medical applications. In one study of human skin fibroblasts, the investigators evaluated the cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and wound-healing properties of several ligand-modified GNRs, among which GNRs modified with neutral and cationic PEG exhibited low levels of cytotoxicity and cellular internalization, while GNRs coated with anionic ligands and bovine serum albumin (BSA) demonstrated a strong cytotoxicity and cellular uptake in human skin fibroblasts[86]. The results of a cell scraping experiment showed that the rate of wound healing significantly increased after incubating neutral cationic PEG-modified GNRs and anion-modified GNRs with the scraped human skin fibroblasts for 24 h, compared with the control group. On the other hand, the injured fibroblasts exposed to BSA-GNRs showed a significant delay in wound healing rate and the release of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin 1β. The surface neutral or cationic modification of GNRs is directly correlated with their ability to increase cellular internalization, and the anionic ligands are harmful to skin cells. Controlling local and systemic elements, including inflammation, proliferation, and maturation, during the healing process is essential to the effectiveness of wound healing. Nanda et al[36] developed a polylactic glycolic acid (PLGA)/polycaprolactone scaffold containing GNRs to accelerate wound healing. The GNR-containing scaffold increased the local temperature to 40 ℃ at the wound of mice following laser irradiation, which further upregulated the expression of HSP70 and promoted the wound healing. In 2023, Singh et al[87] developed a nanoplatform with a core polymer, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), combined with GNRs, which might control and safely deliver drugs to wound sites, thereby promoting targeted wound healing. Furthermore, in the same year, inspired by nanometer array control of cell behavior, Wang et al[88] designed spiky gold-palladium heterostructured nanoparticles (AuPd SHs) with topographical surface architectures. These nanoparticles were capable of promoting multistage wound healing in a programmable manner. Considering that PTT may provide conditions for the on-demand delivery of bio-active molecules, Nakielski et al[89] designed a plasma hydrogel that might induce structural changes in the hydrogel by activating GNRs with NIR light to generate heat, leading to controlled drug release.
Materials | Evaluation models | Key findings | Ref. |
GNRs decorated with different ligands | On human dermal fibroblasts | PEGylated and charged-GNR accelerated the wound healing rate of scratched human dermal fibroblasts in vitro. | [86] |
GNR-incorporated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)/poly(caprolactone) (PCL) | The GNR-incorporated scaffold attached to the wound of mice | The GNR-incorporated scaffold and timely control of HSP70 expression may be used as a promising wound-healing strategy. | [36] |
Smart delivery platform using core-shell nanofibers for sequential drug release in wound healing | In vitro experiments | The authors provided a versatile platform for controlled and safe drug delivery to wound sites, which could be applied to the treatment of other topical diseases. | [87] |
Spiky surface topography of heterostructured nanoparticles for programmable acceleration of multistage wound healing | In vitro and in the wounding model in mice | Spiky AuPd SHs with simple composition and compact structures exhibit hierarchical acceleration in multiple stages of wound healing. | [88] |
As a significant part of dermatologic illnesses, skin infections caused by bacteria, fungi, and viruses may result in life-threatening health problems. High dosages of antibiotics are frequently needed to provide a decent therapeutic effect, because they are ineffective in reaching the infection site[90]. On the other hand, using large dosages of antibiotics raises the possibility of microbial resistance, because microbiota growth is strongly influenced by the dosage and duration of treatment[91]. To solve this issue, a viable substitute known as GNRs-mediated PTT has been created. Table 3 provides a concise and straightforward summary of our work. In 2021, Niu et al[92] developed a nanoconjugate with GNRs decorated with pH-induced charge-switchable tertiary amine groups with bacteriophilic phenylboronic acid molecules to target specific bacterial cells and destroy them using photothermal ablation. GNRs produced heat in response to infrared light stimulation, thereby efficiently destroying the target bacterial cells and accelerating the healing of wounds in diabetic mice. Meanwhile, Sheng et al[93] designed infection microenvironment-responsive multifunctional peptide-coated GNRs for bimodal antibacterial applications, which had both targeting capability and biodegradability. The same targeting issues of GNRs were addressed by Chen et al[94], who devised a combination of GNRs with antimicrobial peptides that had a lower tendency than traditional antibiotics to engender drug resistance in bacteria. Furthermore, in 2022, Zhang et al[95] functionalized GNRs with metal-phenolic networks (MPNs) via a coordination reaction, yielding GNR@MPNs, a tunable biocompatible photothermal nano-sterilization product. These bioactive GNR@MPNs had a high photothermal conversion efficiency that eliminated 99.8% of Escherichia coli and 98.6% of Staphylococcus aureus with a comparatively low effective dose. Lv et al[96] presented the molybdenum disulfide (MoS2)-GNRs-apt in 2023, and found that the incorporation of MoS2 nanosheets significantly enhanced the biocompatibility of GNRs. The antimicrobial property of MoS2-GNRs-apt was much better than that of non-targeted PTT, and they might precisely defeat multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and effectively decrease superfluous M1 inflammatory macrophages to promote infected wound healing. In 2024, Hong et al[97] proposed an innovative nanomaterial-based therapeutic approach (PAu@C/B) with photo-triggered antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities, which improved infectious skin tissue regeneration. To promote infectious skin regeneration, this approach not only exerted an antibacterial effect by uniting mild PTT and PDT, but also inhibited inflammation and promoted growth factor production, collagen deposition, and angiogenesis by controlling drug release.
Materials | Evaluation models | Key findings | Ref. |
GNR decorated with bacterial affinitive molecules phenylboronic acid and pH-induced charge-convertible tertiary-amine group for chronic wounds | In bacterial cells and diabetic rats | Target specific bacterial cells and destroy them using PTT. | [92] |
A selective therapeutic nanorod (MoS2-GNRs-apt) based on molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanosheets coated GNRs | In Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MRPA)-infected wound murine model | This molecular therapeutic strategy displays great potential as a prospective antimicrobial treatment for MRPA infections. | [96] |
Metal-phenolic networks (MPNs) were employed to functionalize GNRs | A mice model infected by methicillin-resistant S. aureus | The GNRs@MPNs may precisely defeat MRPA bacteria and effectively decrease superfluous M1 inflammatory macrophages. | [95] |
Gold-based nanoflower composite with dual drug incorporation | In vitro and in animal models of subcutaneous abscess and skin wound infected with drug-resistant bacteria | It showed good biocompatibility and may improve infectious skin regeneration by its antibacterial/anti-inflammatory effect. | [97] |
Two to five percent of people worldwide suffer from psoriasis, a chronic immune-mediated skin condition characterized by scaling, erythema, and thickness[98]. The increased inflammatory response, overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and excessive keratinocyte proliferation are the primary pathogenic features of psoriasis[99–100]. As a result, psoriasis treatment plans aim to lower inflammation and halt keratinocyte proliferation. GNRs have emerged as a potentially effective treatment option for psoriasis in recent times. Studies have shown that they may cause apoptosis by high temperatures when exposed to NIR light, as shown in Table 4.
Materials | Evaluation models | Key findings | Ref. |
Silver and gold nanoparticles complexed with Cornus mas extract | In vivo and in vitro experiments | This technology provided an efficient tool for modern psoriasis therapy, circumventing immunosuppression-related side effects of biologicals. | [101] |
Gold nanorods (GNRs) and isatin were loaded into a poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) matrix to form the nanocomplexes | Live/dead cell assay and in vivo psoriasiform murine model | The as-prepared nanocomplexes allowed for hyperthermia-induced apoptosis of keratinocytes, and served as a promising therapy against hyperproliferation. | [41] |
A sub-15 nm nanoparticle containing a 3 nm gold core and a shell of 1 000 Da polyethylene glycol strands modified with 30% octadecyl chains | In vitro and in psoriasis mice | This self-therapeutic nanoparticle might be topically delivered to epidermal keratinocytes to prevent and treat psoriasis. | [102] |
A novel strategy to conjugate gold nanorod and dexamethasone | In imiquimod-induced mouse models and HaCaT cells | The study highlighted the GNRs and dexamethasone-conjugated enhancement drugs through the potential of the dermis. | [40] |
For example, Crisan et al[101] have demonstrated the superior anti-inflammatory properties of polyphenol-rich Cornus mas extract against psoriasis. At both the cellular and molecular levels, GNR and Cornus mas extract (Au NPs-CM) worked together to control psoriasis inflammation. Ag and Au NPs-CM is a nanoparticle-based technology that offers an alternative to biological therapies for psoriasis by circumventing the immunosuppressive adverse effects. In 2021, Nirmal et al[41] investigated the use of photothermal nano-systems in the management of psoriasis, suggesting a technique to make GNR-containing nanocomposites with isatin, an anti-inflammatory medication, embedded in a PLGA matrix, where these GNR-loaded nanoparticles, when exposed to NIR radiation with an intensity of 0.42 W/cm2, might convert the NIR radiation into heat, increasing the temperature by 10 ℃; combined with the NIR radiation, the nanocomplexes internalized by keratinocytes induced apoptosis through the caspase and poly-ADP-ribose polymerase pathways. In 2022, Han et al[102] reported that the combination of nanocomplexes and NIR light inhibited neutrophil infiltration and epidermal hyperplasia in an in vivo mouse model of psoriasis. In this study, they proposed a nanoparticle containing a 3-nm gold core and a shell of PEG chains (
As shown in Fig. 5, the general method for synthesizing GNRs is a seed-growth method. In the synthesis process, CTAB acts as a cationic surfactant and significantly increases the productivity of GNRs. GNRs will aggregate irreversibly without a certain number of ligands on their surface. However, the biological toxicity of GNRs mainly comes from the positive charge of CTAB, resulting in necrocytosis[104]. Commonly used methods include exchanging CTAB with chemisorptive agents, such as thiols, phospholipids, and citrate, or coating the surface with other solid-state materials[105–107]. The biocompatibility of GNRs requires a comprehensive understanding of their biomedical effects to recognize any potential toxicity matters[107–109]. The specific risks of cytotoxicity related to the application of GNRs remain unclear, because few investigators have addressed this problem in previous studies, when they emphasize their good biocompatibility. On the contrary, some believe that GNRs themselves do exhibit some cytotoxicity[110]. Various factors, such as the size or shape of the nanoparticles and their surface chemistry, may result in the toxicity of GNRs[111].
Effective endocytosis, relying on many physicochemical and biological factors, is considerably important in the degradation process of GNRs in vivo, and some factors may affect the endocytosis of GNRs[113]. First, the size and AR of rod shaped-gold nanoparticles play an important role in cellular uptake. Neither oversized nor undersized GNRs may result in efficient uptake, because undersized nanoparticles are usually too small to bind ligands with receptors, and oversized GNRs diffuse slowly[114]. According to the literature, GNRs with a size range between 20 and 50 nm may achieve a good endocytic efficiency, with the optimum cellular uptake occurring at 50 nm[114–116]. Meanwhile, the efficiency of uptake increases along with the decrease in AR because of the mechanisms of endocytosis of GNRs: receptor-mediated endocytosis and caveolae-dependent pinocytosis[113–115,117–118]. Surface chemistry also plays an important role in the interaction between nanorods and cells. Additionally, several other factors, such as cell types, substrate constitutions, brooding time, etc., may influence cellular uptake[118–122]. In the metabolism process of GNRs, although gold nanoparticles were considered nontoxic, recent experiments in vivo and in vitro have revealed potential health implications for the use of GNRs[123]. For example, GNRs may induce cellular toxicity and hepatotoxicity in mice, cross the blood-testis barrier, and deposit in the testes, which affects male reproduction[124]. Xu et al[125] proposed that the systemic toxicity of GNRs was mainly affected by their shape, time, and dose; moreover, the results indicated that short GNRs triggered a more serious disorder of cell metabolism, and high concentrations of GNRs caused more significant toxicity. The main toxicity mechanism of GNRs on HepG2 cells was the accumulation of GNRs in cell sub-organs, such as mitochondria, affecting tricarboxylic acid cyclic metabolism and thereby reducing energy production. Hu et al[126] also showed that the photothermal process of GNRs might induce cytotoxicity by affecting pyruvate and glutamate synthesis, normal choline metabolism, and ultimately apoptosis. In recent years, many studies have proposed improving metabolic effects on cancer and non-cancer cells through surface modification of GNRs. For example, positively charged polyethylenimine (PEI)-GNRs showed the highest antitumor effects on A549 cancer cells because of their energy metabolism, choline metabolism, hexosamine biosynthesis pathway, and oxidative stress-related metabolism[127]. Phospholipid-GNRs significantly decreased the levels of energy metabolism, resulting in dysfunction in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, a reduction in glycolytic activity, an imbalance of the redox state, and the proliferation of cancer cells[128].
Although GNRs theoretically show significant light absorption, Ali et al[129] found that their distribution within human cells upon injection was random. The study reported that PEGylated GNRs primarily accumulated in the liver and spleen of mice, where they might stay for up to 15 months without becoming hazardous. It is uncertain, therefore, if these GNRs are safe for use in clinical settings, particularly in cases when total particle removal is not possible. Drug-loaded GNRs are less therapeutically effective than drug-free ones because of their size, which prevents tissue diffusion[130]. Li et al[131] demonstrated that smaller GNRs (7 nm in diameter) were more effectively eliminated in vivo than larger GNRs (14 nm in diameter); besides, other attributes required for biomedical applications were also present in these smaller GNRs, including high cellular uptake, minimal cytotoxicity, and photothermal efficiency; thus, one potential tactic to increase the removal rate might be to change the size of the GNRs. Like in earlier research, we found that GNR size mattered because smaller GNRs were more likely to permeate and accumulate beneath the epidermis. The poor concentration of GNRs at the target site is another issue that may compromise the effectiveness of treatment. The active targeted release of GNRs may be accomplished by using particular ligands, including peptides, antibodies, and aptamers, to get around this issue. It has been demonstrated that this strategy works very well to increase the uptake of particles by tumor tissues. For instance, compared with non-targeting GNRs, GNRs functionalized with GNR-targeting peptides [Au25(Capt)18] have superior tumor penetration and accumulation capabilities[132].
This review discusses the use of GNRs in various dermopathy therapies in recent years. To achieve a better therapeutic effect, GNRs must possess the characteristics such as hypotoxicity, high productivity, good dispersity, and standard particle sizes, shapes, and ARs to ensure perfect photothermal conversion performance. Meanwhile, we have summarized the common synthetic methods, basic properties, and biological applications of GNRs in PTT. Among these methods, the seed-mediated growth method is widely used, because of its easy AR control. Numerous investigators have enhanced the properties of GNRs by fine-tuning synthesis conditions. The toxicity of GNRs can be reduced by highly centrifugal cleaning and removing or masking the native CTAB surfactant on the nanorod surface[133]. Of course, other properties of GNRs may also change as the synthetic parameters are adjusted.
However, investigators hold different opinions on the optimal shape and size of gold nanoparticles. Gold nanoparticles with a rodlike structure possess a better optical property with the SPR effect, compared with other shapes. As for the size of GNRs, the thermal production efficiency, body residues, and skin penetration decrease, as their size increases. Nevertheless, smaller GNRs may present higher cytotoxicity because of their large specific surface area, which leads to deposition on healthy organs and tissues. Therefore, the small size of GNRs may achieve better treatment effects, but also lead to toxic deposits in normal tissues[134]. To solve this problem, some investigators have sought innovative methods to synthesize GNRs, because traditional methods may not achieve the designed size of GNRs, leading to low production and poor dispersion[135].
To obtain better therapeutic effects, some key points need to be achieved, such as increasing skin retention time, enhancing targeting to disease cells, increasing endocytosis, reducing cytotoxicity, improving photothermal conversion efficiency, and eliminating excessive proliferation cells, among others. Furthermore, different reaction conditions may lead to undesirable results, as seen in research on the influence of ectochemiscal elements on endocytosis[136]. Additionally, many studies have not been performed in vivo, suggesting that physical simulation experiments may lack comprehensive representation[137]. In addition, the high endocytosis of GNRs often achieves a good therapeutic effect, it also has toxicity. Literature suggests that GNRs with surface ligands may be better phagocytosed by the cells than naked GNRs, which may benefit PTT applications. Furthermore, more animal models should be developed to simulate human physical structure and behaviors to predict the transport, distribution, excretion, and degradation of GNRs in vivo. GNRs possess several advantageous properties, such as good biocompatibility, high photo-thermal transformation efficiency, excellent optical capabilities, easy synthesis, easy surface modification, and controllable size and AR. Traditional GNRs may only provide single-mode biomedical imaging or cancer therapy mainly because of the limited functionalization. Therefore, advanced structural control strategies are necessary for the preparation and synthesis of GNR nanoparticles to meet actual clinical needs. The following modification strategies have been applied to the surfaces of GNRs: 1) metal deposition at the tips of GNRs or metal coating on the surface of GNRs; 2) a second class of GNRs that are coated with other organic functional shells; and 3) various surface functional groups and compounds that not only improve their biocompatibility in vivo, but also enable GNRs with a series of amazing biomedical capabilities including photoacoustic, X-ray therapy, PTT, PDT, and chemotherapy for cancer treatment[123,138–139]. In addition, the excretion and biocompatibility of GNRs are critical factors. Therefore, more GNRs with excellent biocompatibility should be developed for clinical studies. Thus, we surely believe that nano-composites based on GNRs will have a potential application in the treatment of skin diseases.
However, there are many limitations to the biological application of GNRs, including long-term stability, biological toxicity, in vivo distribution, and final fate after administration. GNRs are toxic in their own right, because they are taken up by Kupffer cells and accumulate in the liver after circulating in vivo, causing organ damage by inducing cell mitochondrial damage and lipid peroxidation[140]. In addition, surface modifications may affect cytotoxicity, such as hemolysis induced by positively charged CTAB-modified GNRs[141]. The PTT and NIR responsive drug delivery systems benefit from the NIR GNR LSPR sensor's ability to transform the absorbed NIR light into heat. The use of GNR-based PTT in dermatological therapy has grown in popularity in recent years. The straightforward surface chemistry of GNRs facilitates their modification with a wide range of reagents, including peptides, antibodies, and aptamers. Furthermore, GNRs may work as multipurpose platforms that may combine multiple drugs to create complex therapeutic systems. In addition, the high endocytosis of GNRs often achieves a good therapeutic effect yet has toxicity, but GNRs with surface ligands may be better phagocytosed by the cells, which may be used in GNRs for PTT applications. Numerous drug release mechanisms have been employed, including dose-dependent release, enzymatic release, light/thermal-triggered release, and pH-sensitivity release. Through the manipulation of surface chemistry and drug release mechanisms, GNRs may supply a range of functional drugs for chemotherapy-paired PTT.
Although GNRs show some promise in the treatment of dermatosis, there are several issues to consider: they may be cytotoxic, take a while to biodistribute, and not penetrate as deeply into the skin as free drugs can. Therefore, new approaches need to be developed to increase treatment efficacy and target accumulation efficiency. Furthermore, before being used on patients, further comprehensive research is needed on the subcutaneous penetration processes of GNRs and the results of post-treatment. Thus, there is still a long way to go before these therapies are used in clinical settings.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82073439 and 82373475).
None.
CLC number: R751.05, Document code: A
The authors reported no conflict of interests.
[1] |
Lee WR, Lin Y, Alalaiwe A, et al. Fractional laser-mediated siRNA delivery for mitigating psoriasis-like lesions via IL-6 silencing[J]. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids, 2020, 19: 240–251. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.013
|
[2] |
Jeong WY, Kim S, Lee SY, et al. Transdermal delivery of Minoxidil using HA-PLGA nanoparticles for the treatment in alopecia[J]. Biomater Res, 2019, 23(1): 16. doi: 10.1186/s40824-019-0164-z
|
[3] |
Yang D, Chen M, Sun Y, et al. Microneedle-mediated transdermal drug delivery for treating diverse skin diseases[J]. Acta Biomater, 2021, 121: 119–133. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.004
|
[4] |
Korkmaz E, Friedrich EE, Ramadan MH, et al. Therapeutic intradermal delivery of tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies using tip-loaded dissolvable microneedle arrays[J]. Acta Biomater, 2015, 24: 96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.05.036
|
[5] |
Tiwari N, Osorio-Blanco ER, Sonzogni A, et al. Nanocarriers for skin applications: where do we stand?[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2022, 61(3): e202107960. doi: 10.1002/anie.202107960
|
[6] |
Bae JM, Ju HJ, Lee RW, et al. Evaluation for skin cancer and precancer in patients with vitiligo treated with long-term narrowband UV-B phototherapy[J]. JAMA Dermatol, 2020, 156(5): 529–537. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0218
|
[7] |
Zhi D, Yang T, O'Hagan J, et al. Photothermal therapy[J]. J Control Release, 2020, 325: 52–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.06.032
|
[8] |
Wang H, Su D, Huang R, et al. Cellular nanovesicles with bioorthogonal targeting enhance photodynamic/photothermal therapy in psoriasis[J]. Acta Biomater, 2021, 134: 674–685. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.068
|
[9] |
Dey A, Singhvi G, Puri A, et al. An insight into photodynamic therapy towards treating major dermatological conditions[J]. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol, 2022, 76: 103751. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103751
|
[10] |
Hu Q, Huang Z, Duan Y, et al. Reprogramming tumor microenvironment with photothermal therapy[J]. Bioconjug Chem, 2020, 31(5): 1268–1278. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00135
|
[11] |
Lee HP, Gaharwar AK. Light-responsive inorganic biomaterials for biomedical applications[J]. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2020, 7(17): 2000863. doi: 10.1002/advs.202000863
|
[12] |
Chen G, Cao Y, Tang Y, et al. Advanced near-infrared light for monitoring and modulating the spatiotemporal dynamics of cell functions in living systems[J]. Adv Sci (Weinh), 2020, 7(8): 1903783. doi: 10.1002/advs.201903783
|
[13] |
Dreaden EC, Alkilany AM, Huang X, et al. The golden age: gold nanoparticles for biomedicine[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41(7): 2740–2779. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15237H
|
[14] |
Yang W, Xia B, Wang L, et al. Shape effects of gold nanoparticles in photothermal cancer therapy[J]. Mater Today Sustain, 2021, 13: 100078.
|
[15] |
Yang W, Liang H, Ma S, et al. Gold nanoparticle based photothermal therapy: development and application for effective cancer treatment[J]. Sustain Mater Technol, 2019, 22: e00109. doi: 10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00109
|
[16] |
Nikoobakht B, El-Sayed MA. Preparation and growth mechanism of gold nanorods (NRs) using seed-mediated growth method[J]. Chem Mater, 2003, 15(10): 1957–1962. doi: 10.1021/cm020732l
|
[17] |
Park K, Hsiao MS, Yi YJ, et al. Highly concentrated seed-mediated synthesis of monodispersed gold nanorods[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9(31): 26363–26371. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b08003
|
[18] |
Tang L, Casas J. Quantification of cardiac biomarkers using label-free and multiplexed gold nanorod bioprobes for myocardial infarction diagnosis[J]. Biosens Bioelectron, 2014, 61: 70–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.04.043
|
[19] |
Huang J, Xu Z, Jiang Y, et al. Metal organic framework-coated gold nanorod as an on-demand drug delivery platform for chemo-photothermal cancer therapy[J]. J Nanobiotechnology, 2021, 19(1): 219. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00961-x
|
[20] |
Huang HC, Barua S, Kay DB, et al. Simultaneous enhancement of photothermal stability and gene delivery efficacy of gold nanorods using polyelectrolytes[J]. ACS Nano, 2009, 3(10): 2941–2952. doi: 10.1021/nn900947a
|
[21] |
Vigderman L, Zubarev ER. High-yield synthesis of gold nanorods with longitudinal SPR peak greater than 1200 nm using hydroquinone as a reducing agent[J]. Chem Mater, 2013, 25(8): 1450–1457. doi: 10.1021/cm303661d
|
[22] |
Ye X, Zheng C, Chen J, et al. Using binary surfactant mixtures to simultaneously improve the dimensional tunability and monodispersity in the seeded growth of gold nanorods[J]. Nano Lett, 2013, 13(2): 765–771. doi: 10.1021/nl304478h
|
[23] |
Khlebtsov BN, Khanadeev VA, Ye J, et al. Overgrowth of gold nanorods by using a binary surfactant mixture[J]. Langmuir, 2014, 30(6): 1696–1703. doi: 10.1021/la404399n
|
[24] |
Riley RS, Day ES. Gold nanoparticle-mediated photothermal therapy: applications and opportunities for multimodal cancer treatment[J]. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol, 2017, 9(4): e1449. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1449
|
[25] |
Gudlur S, Goyal G, Pradhan A, et al. Cationic liposomes enable shape control in surfactant-free synthesis of biocompatible gold nanorods[J]. Chem Mater, 2021, 33(12): 4558–4567. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00973
|
[26] |
Manivasagan P, Hoang G, Santha Moorthy M, et al. Chitosan/fucoidan multilayer coating of gold nanorods as highly efficient near-infrared photothermal agents for cancer therapy[J]. Carbohydr Polym, 2019, 211: 360–369. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.010
|
[27] |
Adeyemi OS, Sulaiman FA. Evaluation of metal nanoparticles for drug delivery systems[J]. J Biomed Res, 2015, 29(2): 145–149. doi: 10.7555/JBR.28.20130096
|
[28] |
Fu L, Feng Q, Chen Y, et al. Nanofibers for the immunoregulation in biomedical applications[J]. Adv Fiber Mater, 2022, 4(6): 1334–1356. doi: 10.1007/s42765-022-00191-2
|
[29] |
Chen L, Sun X, Cheng K, et al. Temperature-regulating phase change fiber scaffold toward mild photothermal–chemotherapy[J]. Adv Fiber Mater, 2022, 4(6): 1669–1684. doi: 10.1007/s42765-022-00199-8
|
[30] |
Yang J, Xu L, Ding Y, et al. NIR-II-triggered composite nanofibers to simultaneously achieve intracranial hemostasis, killing superbug and residual cancer cells in brain tumor resection surgery[J]. Adv Fiber Mater, 2023, 5(1): 209–222. doi: 10.1007/s42765-022-00210-2
|
[31] |
Ren Q, Zhang X, Sheng Y, et al. Phytic acid-Cu2+ framework/Cu2-xS nanocomposites with heat-shock protein down-modulation ability for enhanced multimodal combination therapy[J]. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2023, 652: 2116–2126. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.09.024
|
[32] |
Sheng Y, Ren Q, Tao C, et al. Construction of PEGylated chlorin e6@CuS-Pt theranostic nanoplatforms for nanozymes-enhanced photodynamic-photothermal therapy[J]. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2023, 645: 122–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.04.092
|
[33] |
Wang Z, Li J, Qiao Y, et al. Rapid ferroelectric-photoexcited bacteria-killing of Bi4Ti3O12/Ti3C2T x nanofiber membranes[J]. Adv Fiber Mater, 2023, 5(2): 484–496. doi: 10.1007/s42765-022-00234-8
|
[34] |
Xu X, Ding Y, Hadianamrei R, et al. Antimicrobial peptide functionalized gold nanorods combining near-infrared photothermal therapy for effective wound healing[J]. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces, 2022, 220: 112887. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112887
|
[35] |
Yin M, Yang M, Yan D, et al. Surface-charge-switchable and size-transformable thermosensitive nanocomposites for chemo-photothermal eradication of bacterial biofilms in vitro and in vivo[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2022, 14(7): 8847–8864. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c24229
|
[36] |
Nanda SS, Wang T, Hossain MI, et al. Gold-nanorod-based scaffolds for wound-healing applications[J]. ACS Appl Nano Mater, 2022, 5(6): 8640–8648. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.2c02230
|
[37] |
Huang X, Xu L, Yu X, et al. Near-infrared light-responsive multifunctional hydrogel releasing peptide-functionalized gold nanorods sequentially for diabetic wound healing[J]. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2023, 639: 369–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.02.078
|
[38] |
Shao Y, Hao C, Guo Y, et al. Stable hybrid nanocapsules with gold nanorods and cyanine dyes for near-infrared photothermal ablation of subcutaneous tumor[J]. Adv Ther, 2023, 6(7): 2300066. doi: 10.1002/adtp.202300066
|
[39] |
Wang S, Zhao X, Wang S, et al. Biologically inspired polydopamine capped gold nanorods for drug delivery and light-mediated cancer therapy[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 8(37): 24368–24384. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b05907
|
[40] |
Kim N, Jeong YG, Lee S, et al. Ameliorated skin inflammation through the synergistic effect of gold nanorod-dexamethasone and photothermal therapy[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2024, 16(10): 12217–12231. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c16919
|
[41] |
Nirmal GR, Lin ZC, Tsai MJ, et al. Photothermal treatment by PLGA-gold nanorod-isatin nanocomplexes under near-infrared irradiation for alleviating psoriasiform hyperproliferation[J]. J Control Release, 2021, 333: 487–499. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.04.005
|
[42] |
Zhang Y, Li Y, Liao W, et al. Citrate-stabilized gold nanorods-directed osteogenic differentiation of multiple cells[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2021, 16: 2789–2801. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S299515
|
[43] |
Dheyab MA, Aziz AA, Khaniabadi PM, et al. Gold nanoparticles-based photothermal therapy for breast cancer[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2023, 42: 103312. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103312
|
[44] |
Kim F, Song JH, Yang P. Photochemical synthesis of gold nanorods[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2002, 124(48): 14316–14317. doi: 10.1021/ja028110o
|
[45] |
Chen J, Jackson AA, Rotello VM, et al. Colorimetric detection of Escherichia coli based on the enzyme-induced metallization of gold nanorods[J]. Small, 2016, 12(18): 2469–2475. doi: 10.1002/smll.201503682
|
[46] |
Moon KS, Park YB, Bae JM, et al. Near-infrared laser-mediated drug release and antibacterial activity of gold nanorod–sputtered titania nanotubes[J]. J Tissue Eng, 2018, 9: 2041731418790315.
|
[47] |
Du B, Ma C, Ding G, et al. Cooperative strategies for enhancing performance of photothermal therapy (PTT) agent: optimizing its photothermal conversion and cell internalization ability[J]. Small, 2017, 13(13): 1603275. doi: 10.1002/smll.201603275
|
[48] |
Morales-Dalmau J, Vilches C, de Miguel I, et al. Optimum morphology of gold nanorods for light-induced hyperthermia[J]. Nanoscale, 2018, 10(5): 2632–2638. doi: 10.1039/C7NR06825E
|
[49] |
Jain PK, Lee KS, El-Sayed IH, et al. Calculated absorption and scattering properties of gold nanoparticles of different size, shape, and composition: applications in biological imaging and biomedicine[J]. J Phys Chem B, 2006, 110(14): 7238–7248. doi: 10.1021/jp057170o
|
[50] |
Plessers E, Stassen I, Sree SP, et al. Resolving interparticle heterogeneities in composition and hydrogenation performance between individual supported silver on silica catalysts[J]. ACS Catal, 2015, 5(11): 6690–6695. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02119
|
[51] |
Manivasagan P, Bharathiraja S, Santha Moorthy M, et al. Biocompatible chitosan oligosaccharide modified gold nanorods as highly effective photothermal agents for ablation of breast cancer cells[J]. Polymers (Basel), 2018, 10(3): 232. doi: 10.3390/polym10030232
|
[52] |
He L, Mao C, Brasino M, et al. TiO2-capped gold nanorods for Plasmon-enhanced production of reactive oxygen species and photothermal delivery of chemotherapeutic agents[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10(33): 27965–27971. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b08868
|
[53] |
Hou G, Qian J, Xu W, et al. A novel pH-sensitive targeting polysaccharide-gold nanorod conjugate for combined photothermal-chemotherapy of breast cancer[J]. Carbohydr Polym, 2019, 212: 334–344. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.045
|
[54] |
Wang J, Zhu C, Han J, et al. Controllable synthesis of gold nanorod/conducting polymer core/shell hybrids toward in vitro and in vivo near-infrared photothermal therapy[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10(15): 12323–12330. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b16784
|
[55] |
Huang X, Neretina S, El-Sayed MA. Gold nanorods: from synthesis and properties to biological and biomedical applications[J]. Adv Mater, 2009, 21(48): 4880–4910. doi: 10.1002/adma.200802789
|
[56] |
Strobl K, Selivanovitch E, Ibáñez-Freire P, et al. Electromechanical photophysics of GFP packed inside viral protein cages probed by force-fluorescence hybrid single-molecule microscopy[J]. Small, 2022, 18(28): 2200059. doi: 10.1002/smll.202200059
|
[57] |
Chen H, Shao L, Li Q, et al. Gold nanorods and their plasmonic properties[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2013, 42(7): 2679–2724. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35367A
|
[58] |
Zhang Y, Wu H, Wang H, et al. Ultraminiature optical fiber-tip directly-printed plasmonic biosensors for label-free biodetection[J]. Biosens Bioelectron, 2022, 218: 114761. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2022.114761
|
[59] |
Huang JA, Caprettini V, Zhao Y, et al. On-demand intracellular delivery of single particles in single cells by 3D hollow nanoelectrodes[J]. Chem Mater, 2018, 19(2): 722–731. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03764
|
[60] |
Pang C, Gao L, Singh AV, et al. Synthesis, formation mechanism, and magnetic properties of monodisperse semiconducting spinel CdCr2S4 nanocrystals via a facile "seed-mediated" growth method[J]. Chem Mater, 2018, 30(5): 1701–1709. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05227
|
[61] |
Wu W, Cui J, Sultan U, et al. Diffusion of gold nanoparticles in porous silica monoliths determined by dynamic light scattering[J]. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2023, 641: 251–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.03.045
|
[62] |
Khlebtsov NG, Dykman LA, Khlebtsov BN. Synthesis and plasmonic tuning of gold and gold–silver nanoparticles[J]. Russ Chem Rev, 2022, 91(10): RCR5058. doi: 10.57634/RCR5058
|
[63] |
Costa DF, Mendes LP, Torchilin VP. The effect of low- and high-penetration light on localized cancer therapy[J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2019, 138: 105–116. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.09.004
|
[64] |
Smith AM, Mancini MC, Nie S. Second window for in vivo imaging[J]. Nat Nanotechnol, 2009, 4(11): 710–711. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.326
|
[65] |
Lin H, Yu J, Chen F, et al. Visualizing the interfacial chemistry in multivalent metal anodes by transmission electron microscopy[J]. Small Methods, 2023, 7(10): 2300561. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202300561
|
[66] |
Choe M, Titov DV. Genetically encoded tools for measuring and manipulating metabolism[J]. Nat Chem Biol, 2022, 18(5): 451–460. doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01012-8
|
[67] |
Pérez-Juste J, Pastoriza-Santos I, Liz-Marzán LM, et al. Gold nanorods: synthesis, characterization and applications[J]. Coord Chem Rev, 2005, 249(17-18): 1870–1901. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.01.030
|
[68] |
Ma X, Huh J, Park W, et al. Gold nanocrystals with DNA-directed morphologies[J]. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 12873. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12873
|
[69] |
Wang L, Pei J, Cong Z, et al. Development of anisamide-targeted PEGylated gold nanorods to deliver epirubicin for chemo-photothermal therapy in tumor-bearing mice[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2019, 14: 1817–1833. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S192520
|
[70] |
Taylor ML, Wilson RE Jr, Amrhein KD, et al. Gold nanorod-assisted photothermal therapy and improvement strategies[J]. Bioengineering (Basel), 2022, 9(5): 200. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9050200
|
[71] |
Tian Y, Qiang S, Wang L. Gold nanomaterials for imaging-guided near-infrared in vivo cancer therapy[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2019, 7: 398. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00398
|
[72] |
Khan SA, Kanchanapally R, Fan Z, et al. A gold nanocage–CNT hybrid for targeted imaging and photothermal destruction of cancer cells[J]. Chem Commun, 2012, 48(53): 6711–6713. doi: 10.1039/c2cc32313c
|
[73] |
Kim HS, Lee DY. Near-infrared-responsive cancer photothermal and photodynamic therapy using gold nanoparticles[J]. Polymers (Basel), 2018, 10(9): 961. doi: 10.3390/polym10090961
|
[74] |
Malaiya A, Singhai M, Singh M, et al. Recent update on the Alzheimer's disease progression, diagnosis and treatment approaches[J]. Curr Drug Targets, 2022, 23(10): 978–1001. doi: 10.2174/1389450123666220526155144
|
[75] |
Morgan HJ, Rees E, Lanfredini S, et al. CD200 ectodomain shedding into the tumor microenvironment leads to NK cell dysfunction and apoptosis[J]. J Clin Invest, 2022, 132(21): e150750. doi: 10.1172/JCI150750
|
[76] |
Wang Q, Chen N, Li M, et al. Light-related activities of metal-based nanoparticles and their implications on dermatological treatment[J]. Drug Deliv Transl Res, 2023, 13(2): 386–399. doi: 10.1007/s13346-022-01216-4
|
[77] |
Singh P, Haloi P, Singh K, et al. Palladium nanocapsules for photothermal therapy in the near-infrared II biological window[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2023, 15(33): 39081–39098. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c06186
|
[78] |
Rao L, Bu L, Ma L, et al. Platelet-facilitated photothermal therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57(4): 986–991. doi: 10.1002/anie.201709457
|
[79] |
Jin X, Yang H, Mao Z, et al. Cathepsin B-responsive multifunctional peptide conjugated gold nanorods for mitochondrial targeting and precise photothermal cancer therapy[J]. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2021, 601: 714–726. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.135
|
[80] |
Ding Y, Sun Z, Tong Z, et al. Tumor microenvironment-responsive multifunctional peptide coated ultrasmall gold nanoparticles and their application in cancer radiotherapy[J]. Theranostics, 2020, 10(12): 5195–5208. doi: 10.7150/thno.45017
|
[81] |
Navarro-Palomares E, García-Hevia L, Galán-Vidal J, et al. Shiga toxin-B targeted gold nanorods for local photothermal treatment in oral cancer clinical samples[J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2022, 17: 5747–5760. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S381628
|
[82] |
Hai Y, Wang H, Qiu Y, et al. Optimization of endothelial growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody-gold nanorods photothermal therapy for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Bioengineered, 2022, 13(2): 3262–3274. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2025517
|
[83] |
Xie J, Liang R, Li Q, et al. Photosensitizer-loaded gold nanocages for immunogenic phototherapy of aggressive melanoma[J]. Acta Biomater, 2022, 142: 264–273. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.01.051
|
[84] |
Luo Y, Li J, Liu X, et al. Dual metal-organic framework heterointerface[J]. ACS Cent Sci, 2019, 5(9): 1591–1601. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00639
|
[85] |
Wang C, Jiang X, Kim HJ, et al. Flexible patch with printable and antibacterial conductive hydrogel electrodes for accelerated wound healing[J]. Biomaterials, 2022, 285: 121479. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121479
|
[86] |
Mahmoud NN, Al-Kharabsheh LM, Khalil EA, et al. Interaction of gold nanorods with human dermal fibroblasts: cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and wound healing[J]. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2019, 9(8): 1131. doi: 10.3390/nano9081131
|
[87] |
Singh B, Kim J, Shukla N, et al. Smart delivery platform using core–shell nanofibers for sequential drug release in wound healing[J]. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 2023, 6(6): 2314–2324. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.3c00178
|
[88] |
Wang Y, Feng Y, Yan J, et al. Spiky surface topography of heterostructured nanoparticles for programmable acceleration of multistage wound healing[J]. Mater Today Nano, 2023, 23: 100351. doi: 10.1016/j.mtnano.2023.100351
|
[89] |
Nakielski P, Pawłowska S, Rinoldi C, et al. Multifunctional platform based on electrospun nanofibers and plasmonic hydrogel: a smart nanostructured pillow for near-infrared light-driven biomedical applications[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12(49): 54328–54342. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c13266
|
[90] |
Ahmed IS, Elnahas OS, Assar NH, et al. Nanocrystals of fusidic acid for dual enhancement of dermal delivery and antibacterial activity: in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo evaluation[J]. Pharmaceutics, 2020, 12(3): 199. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12030199
|
[91] |
Azim S, McDowell D, Cartagena A, et al. Venom peptides cathelicidin and lycotoxin cause strong inhibition of Escherichia coli ATP synthase[J]. Int J Biol Macromol, 2016, 87: 246–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.061
|
[92] |
Niu Y, Zhang J, Sun J, et al. A multi-targeted nanoconjugate for light-driven therapy of chronic wounds[J]. Chem Eng J, 2021, 414: 128835. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128835
|
[93] |
Sheng G, Ni J, Xing K, et al. Infection microenvironment-responsive multifunctional peptide coated gold nanorods for bimodal antibacterial applications[J]. Colloid Interface Sci Commun, 2021, 41: 100379. doi: 10.1016/j.colcom.2021.100379
|
[94] |
Chen J, Dai T, Yu J, et al. Integration of antimicrobial peptides and gold nanorods for bimodal antibacterial applications[J]. Biomater Sci, 2020, 8(16): 4447–4457. doi: 10.1039/D0BM00782J
|
[95] |
Zhang C, Huang L, Sun D, et al. Interfacing metal-polyphenolic networks upon photothermal gold nanorods for triplex-evolved biocompatible bactericidal activity[J]. J Hazard Mater, 2022, 426: 127824. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127824
|
[96] |
Lv J, Li B, Luo T, et al. Selective photothermal therapy based on lipopolysaccharide aptamer functionalized MoS2 nanosheet-coated gold nanorods for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection[J]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2023, 12(15): 2202794. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202794
|
[97] |
Hong J, Zhu J, Cao X, et al. Photo-triggered multifunctional gold-based hybrid nanoflowers promote infectious skin regeneration[J]. Chem Eng J, 2024, 482: 148937. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.148937
|
[98] |
Sala M, Elaissari A, Fessi H. Advances in psoriasis physiopathology and treatments: up to date of mechanistic insights and perspectives of novel therapies based on innovative skin drug delivery systems (ISDDS)[J]. J Control Release, 2016, 239: 182–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.07.003
|
[99] |
Xie J, Huang S, Huang H, et al. Advances in the application of natural products and the novel drug delivery systems for psoriasis[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2021, 12: 644952. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.644952
|
[100] |
Li X, Choi DK, Lim SK, et al. Stimulation of keratinocyte differentiation by extract of combined medicinal plant[J]. J Biomed Res, 2014, 15(4): 176–181. doi: 10.12729/jbr.2014.15.4.176
|
[101] |
Crisan D, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Crisan M, et al. Topical silver and gold nanoparticles complexed with Cornus mas suppress inflammation in human psoriasis plaques by inhibiting NF-κB activity[J]. Exp Dermatol, 2018, 27(10): 1166–1169. doi: 10.1111/exd.13707
|
[102] |
Han R, Ho LWC, Bai Q, et al. Alkyl-terminated gold nanoparticles as a self-therapeutic treatment for psoriasis[J]. Nano Lett, 2021, 21(20): 8723–8733. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02899
|
[103] |
Fang L, Wang W, Liu Y, et al. Zeolitic imidazole framework coated Au nanorods for enhanced photothermal therapy and stability[J]. Dalton Trans, 2017, 46(28): 8933–8937. doi: 10.1039/c7dt00613f
|
[104] |
Jia Y, Shi K, Liao J, et al. Effects of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide on the toxicity of gold nanorods both in vitro and in vivo: molecular origin of cytotoxicity and inflammation[J]. Small Methods, 2020, 4(3): 1900799. doi: 10.1002/smtd.201900799
|
[105] |
Lu L, Xia Y. Enzymatic reaction modulated gold nanorod end-to-end self-assembly for ultrahigh sensitively colorimetric sensing of cholinesterase and organophosphate pesticides in human blood[J]. Anal Chem, 2015, 87(16): 8584–8591. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02516
|
[106] |
Cui L, Xiong C, Zhou M, et al. Integrin αvβ3-targeted [64Cu]CuS nanoparticles for PET/CT imaging and photothermal ablation therapy[J]. Bioconjug Chem, 2018, 29(12): 4062–4071. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00690
|
[107] |
Yang G, Phua SZF, Bindra AK, et al. Degradability and clearance of inorganic nanoparticles for biomedical applications[J]. Adv Mater, 2019, 31(10): 1805730. doi: 10.1002/adma.201805730
|
[108] |
Cai R, Chen C. The crown and the scepter: roles of the protein corona in nanomedicine[J]. Adv Mater, 2019, 31(45): 1805740. doi: 10.1002/adma.201805740
|
[109] |
Mrakovcic M, Meindl C, Roblegg E, et al. Reaction of monocytes to polystyrene and silica nanoparticles in short-term and long-term exposures[J]. Toxicol Res (Camb), 2014, 3(2): 86–97. doi: 10.1039/c3tx50112d
|
[110] |
Fratoddi I, Venditti I, Cametti C, et al. How toxic are gold nanoparticles? The state-of-the-art[J]. Nano Res, 2015, 8(6): 1771–1799. doi: 10.1007/s12274-014-0697-3
|
[111] |
Zare I, Yaraki MT, Speranza G, et al. Gold nanostructures: synthesis, properties, and neurological applications[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2022, 51(7): 2601–2680. doi: 10.1039/D1CS01111A
|
[112] |
Gole A, Murphy CJ. Seed-mediated synthesis of gold nanorods: role of the size and nature of the seed[J]. Chem Mater, 2004, 16(19): 3633–3640. doi: 10.1021/cm0492336
|
[113] |
Yang H, Chen Z, Zhang L, et al. Mechanism for the cellular uptake of targeted gold nanorods of defined aspect ratios[J]. Small, 2016, 12(37): 5178–5189. doi: 10.1002/smll.201601483
|
[114] |
Chithrani BD, Ghazani AA, Chan WCW. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells[J]. Nano Lett, 2006, 6(4): 662–668. doi: 10.1021/nl052396o
|
[115] |
Jiang W, Kim BYS, Rutka JT, et al. Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent[J]. Nat Nanotechnol, 2008, 3(3): 145–150. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.30
|
[116] |
Chithrani DB. Intracellular uptake, transport, and processing of gold nanostructures[J]. Mol Membr Biol, 2010, 27(7): 299–311. doi: 10.3109/09687688.2010.507787
|
[117] |
Qiu Y, Liu Y, Wang L, et al. Surface chemistry and aspect ratio mediated cellular uptake of Au nanorods[J]. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(30): 7606–7619. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.051
|
[118] |
Zhu XM, Fang C, Jia H, et al. Cellular uptake behaviour, photothermal therapy performance, and cytotoxicity of gold nanorods with various coatings[J]. Nanoscale, 2014, 6(19): 11462–11472. doi: 10.1039/C4NR03865G
|
[119] |
Zhang Y, Wei G, Yu J, et al. Surface Plasmon enhanced energy transfer between gold nanorods and fluorophores: application to endocytosis study and RNA detection[J]. Faraday Discuss, 2015, 178: 383–394. doi: 10.1039/C4FD00199K
|
[120] |
Mahmoud NN, Abu-Dahab R, Hamadneh LA, et al. Insights into the cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and cellular death modality of phospholipid-coated gold nanorods toward breast cancer cell lines[J]. Mol Pharm, 2019, 16(10): 4149–4164. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00470
|
[121] |
Kah JCY, Grabinski C, Untener E, et al. Protein coronas on gold nanorods passivated with amphiphilic ligands affect cytotoxicity and cellular response to penicillin/streptomycin[J]. ACS Nano, 2014, 8(5): 4608–4620. doi: 10.1021/nn5002886
|
[122] |
Quan P, Bu W, Lin B, et al. Correlating ligand density with cellular uptake of gold nanorods revealed by X-ray reflectivity[J]. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 2019, 19(12): 7557–7563. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2019.16749
|
[123] |
Jia Y, Ma B, Wei X, et al. The in vitro and in vivo toxicity of gold nanoparticles[J]. Chin Chem Lett, 2017, 28(4): 691–702. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.01.021
|
[124] |
Wang X, Li Y, Wang H, et al. Gold nanorod-based localized surface plasmon resonance biosensor for sensitive detection of hepatitis B virus in buffer, blood serum and plasma[J]. Biosens Bioelectron, 2010, 26(2): 404–410. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.07.121
|
[125] |
Xu B, Chen M, Ji X, et al. Metabolomic profiles delineate the potential role of glycine in gold nanorod-induced disruption of mitochondria and blood-testis barrier factors in TM-4 cells[J]. Nanoscale, 2014, 6(14): 8265–8273. doi: 10.1039/C4NR01035C
|
[126] |
Hu M, Wen C, Liu J, et al. Mechanism of cytotoxic action of gold nanorods photothermal therapy for A549 cell[J]. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 2023, 6(5): 1886–1895. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.3c00111
|
[127] |
Liu Z, Wang L, Zhang L, et al. Metabolic characteristics of 16HBE and A549 cells exposed to different surface modified gold nanorods[J]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2016, 5(18): 2363–2375. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201600164
|
[128] |
Dahabiyeh LA, Mahmoud NN, Al-Natour MA, et al. Phospholipid-gold nanorods induce energy crisis in MCF-7 cells: cytotoxicity evaluation using LC-MS-based metabolomics approach[J]. Biomolecules, 2021, 11(3): 364. doi: 10.3390/biom11030364
|
[129] |
Ali MRK, Rahman MA, Wu Y, et al. Efficacy, long-term toxicity, and mechanistic studies of gold nanorods photothermal therapy of cancer in xenograft mice[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017, 114(15): E3110–E3118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619302114
|
[130] |
Demir Duman F, Sebek M, Thanh NTK, et al. Enhanced photodynamic therapy and fluorescence imaging using gold nanorods for porphyrin delivery in a novel in vitro squamous cell carcinoma 3D model[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2020, 8(23): 5131–5142. doi: 10.1039/D0TB00810A
|
[131] |
Li Z, Tang S, Wang B, et al. Metabolizable small gold nanorods: size-dependent cytotoxicity, cell uptake and in vivo biodistribution[J]. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2016, 2(5): 789–797. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00538
|
[132] |
Liu P, Yang W, Shi L, et al. Concurrent photothermal therapy and photodynamic therapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by gold nanoclusters under a single NIR laser irradiation[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2019, 7(44): 6924–6933. doi: 10.1039/C9TB01573F
|
[133] |
Allen JM, Xu J, Blahove M, et al. Synthesis of less toxic gold nanorods by using dodecylethyldimethylammonium bromide as an alternative growth-directing surfactant[J]. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2017, 505: 1172–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.06.101
|
[134] |
Ali MRK, Wu Y, El-Sayed MA. Gold-nanoparticle-assisted plasmonic photothermal therapy advances toward clinical application[J]. J Phys Chem C, 2019, 123(25): 15375–15393. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b01961
|
[135] |
Chang HH, Murphy CJ. Mini gold nanorods with tunable plasmonic peaks beyond 1000 nm[J]. Chem Mater, 2018, 30(4): 1427–1435.
|
[136] |
Hashemi F, Hormozi-Nezhad MR, Corbo C, et al. Laser irradiation affects the biological identity and cellular uptake of plasmonic nanoparticles[J]. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(13): 5974–5981. doi: 10.1039/C8NR09622H
|
[137] |
Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE. Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials[J]. Nat Nanotechnol, 2007, 2(8): 469–478. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.223
|
[138] |
Pan H, Low S, Weerasuriya N, et al. Graphene oxide-promoted reshaping and coarsening of gold nanorods and nanoparticles[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7(5): 3406–3413.
|
[139] |
Yuan B, Gu H, Xu B, et al. Effects of gold nanorods on imprinted genes expression in TM-4 Sertoli cells[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2016, 13(3): 271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030271
|
[140] |
Nunes ÁM, da Silva KRM, Calado CMS, et al. Evaluation of gold nanorods toxicity on isolated mitochondria[J]. Toxicology, 2019, 413: 24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2018.12.002
|
[141] |
Cai H, Ma Y, Wu Z, et al. Protein corona influences liver accumulation and hepatotoxicity of gold nanorods[J]. NanoImpact, 2016, 3–4: 40–46.
|
[1] | Ruyu Wang, Haoran Wang, Junyu Mu, Hua Yuan, Yongchu Pang, Yuli Wang, Yifei Du, Feng Han. Molecular events in the jaw vascular unit: A traditional review of the mechanisms involved in inflammatory jaw bone diseases[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2023, 37(5): 313-325. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.36.20220266 |
[2] | Weixi Feng, Yanli Zhang, Peng Sun, Ming Xiao. Acquired immunity and Alzheimer's disease[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2023, 37(1): 15-29. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.36.20220083 |
[3] | Mingzi Zhang, Qi Li, Yehong Sun. Skin rash caused by EGFR-TKI could be treated successfully by Pien Tze Huang Unguentum Compositum: a case report[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2022, 36(6): 440-445. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.36.20220065 |
[4] | Konishi Colin T., Long Chengzu. Progress and challenges in CRISPR-mediated therapeutic genome editing for monogenic diseases[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2021, 35(2): 148-162. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.34.20200105 |
[5] | Tao Chun'ai, Gan Yongxin, Su Weidong, Li Zhutian, Tang Xiaolan. Effectiveness of hospital disinfection and experience learnt from 11 years of surveillance[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2019, 33(6): 408-413. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.33.20180118 |
[6] | Huang Haodi, Ma Wang, Xu Ke, Dear Keith, Yu Huiyan, Qi Xian, Bao Changjun, Zhou Minghao, Huo Xiang. Estimation of the actual disease burden of human H7N9 infection in Jiangsu of eastern China from March 2013 to September 2017[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2019, 33(5): 325-332. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.33.20180127 |
[7] | Huan Liu, Shijiang Zhang, Yongfeng Shao, Xiaohu Lu, Weidong Gu, Buqing Ni, Qun Gu, Junjie Du. Biomechanical characterization of a novel ring connector for sutureless aortic anastomosis[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(6): 454-460. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20170011 |
[8] | Huanqiang Wang, Congying Yang, Siyuan Wang, Tian Wang, Jingling Han, Kai Wei, Fucun Liu, Jida Xu, Xianzhen Peng, Jianming Wang. Cell-free plasma hypermethylated CASZ1, CDH13 and ING2 are promising biomarkers of esophageal cancer[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(6): 424-433. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.32.20170065 |
[9] | Christopher J. Danford, Zemin Yao, Z. Gordon Jiang. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a narrative review of genetics[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(6): 389-400. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.32.20180045 |
[10] | Huma Ali, Savita Dixit. Quercetin attenuates the development of 7, 12-dimethyl benz (a) anthracene (DMBA) and croton oil-induced skin cancer in mice[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2015, 29(2): 139-144. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.29.20130025 |
Materials | Evaluation models | Key findings | Ref. |
Platelet-facilitated photothermal tumor therapy | In vitro and in vivo using the method of electroporation | This therapy could effectively inhibit the growth of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. | [78] |
Nanoparticles directed by ShTxB as a local treatment | Preclinical murine models and patient biopsy cells | This research showed an effective treatment for aggressive localized cancer. | [81] |
Photothermal effects mediated by EGFRmAb-GNRs | In an animal model of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma | The EGFRmAb combined with GNRs achieved a photothermal effect in the treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. | [82] |
Load the photosensitizer gold nanoparticles cage for immunogenic phototherapy of aggressive melanoma | In B16-F10 cells and in C57BL/6 female mice | This material may destroy the main cancer with NIR irradiation, and clear away the antitumor immunity to inhibit the metastasis and recurrence as well. | [83] |
Materials | Evaluation models | Key findings | Ref. |
GNRs decorated with different ligands | On human dermal fibroblasts | PEGylated and charged-GNR accelerated the wound healing rate of scratched human dermal fibroblasts in vitro. | [86] |
GNR-incorporated poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)/poly(caprolactone) (PCL) | The GNR-incorporated scaffold attached to the wound of mice | The GNR-incorporated scaffold and timely control of HSP70 expression may be used as a promising wound-healing strategy. | [36] |
Smart delivery platform using core-shell nanofibers for sequential drug release in wound healing | In vitro experiments | The authors provided a versatile platform for controlled and safe drug delivery to wound sites, which could be applied to the treatment of other topical diseases. | [87] |
Spiky surface topography of heterostructured nanoparticles for programmable acceleration of multistage wound healing | In vitro and in the wounding model in mice | Spiky AuPd SHs with simple composition and compact structures exhibit hierarchical acceleration in multiple stages of wound healing. | [88] |
Materials | Evaluation models | Key findings | Ref. |
GNR decorated with bacterial affinitive molecules phenylboronic acid and pH-induced charge-convertible tertiary-amine group for chronic wounds | In bacterial cells and diabetic rats | Target specific bacterial cells and destroy them using PTT. | [92] |
A selective therapeutic nanorod (MoS2-GNRs-apt) based on molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanosheets coated GNRs | In Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MRPA)-infected wound murine model | This molecular therapeutic strategy displays great potential as a prospective antimicrobial treatment for MRPA infections. | [96] |
Metal-phenolic networks (MPNs) were employed to functionalize GNRs | A mice model infected by methicillin-resistant S. aureus | The GNRs@MPNs may precisely defeat MRPA bacteria and effectively decrease superfluous M1 inflammatory macrophages. | [95] |
Gold-based nanoflower composite with dual drug incorporation | In vitro and in animal models of subcutaneous abscess and skin wound infected with drug-resistant bacteria | It showed good biocompatibility and may improve infectious skin regeneration by its antibacterial/anti-inflammatory effect. | [97] |
Materials | Evaluation models | Key findings | Ref. |
Silver and gold nanoparticles complexed with Cornus mas extract | In vivo and in vitro experiments | This technology provided an efficient tool for modern psoriasis therapy, circumventing immunosuppression-related side effects of biologicals. | [101] |
Gold nanorods (GNRs) and isatin were loaded into a poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) matrix to form the nanocomplexes | Live/dead cell assay and in vivo psoriasiform murine model | The as-prepared nanocomplexes allowed for hyperthermia-induced apoptosis of keratinocytes, and served as a promising therapy against hyperproliferation. | [41] |
A sub-15 nm nanoparticle containing a 3 nm gold core and a shell of 1 000 Da polyethylene glycol strands modified with 30% octadecyl chains | In vitro and in psoriasis mice | This self-therapeutic nanoparticle might be topically delivered to epidermal keratinocytes to prevent and treat psoriasis. | [102] |
A novel strategy to conjugate gold nanorod and dexamethasone | In imiquimod-induced mouse models and HaCaT cells | The study highlighted the GNRs and dexamethasone-conjugated enhancement drugs through the potential of the dermis. | [40] |