Christopher J. Danford, Zemin Yao, Z. Gordon Jiang. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a narrative review of genetics[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(6): 389-400. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.32.20180045
Citation:
Christopher J. Danford, Zemin Yao, Z. Gordon Jiang. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a narrative review of genetics[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(6): 389-400. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.32.20180045
Christopher J. Danford, Zemin Yao, Z. Gordon Jiang. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a narrative review of genetics[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(6): 389-400. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.32.20180045
Citation:
Christopher J. Danford, Zemin Yao, Z. Gordon Jiang. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a narrative review of genetics[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(6): 389-400. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.32.20180045
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is now the most common cause of chronic liver diseases worldwide. It encompasses a spectrum of disorders ranging from isolated hepatic steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. One of the key challenges in NAFLD is identifying which patients will progress. Epidemiological and genetic studies indicate a strong pattern of heritability that may explain some of the variability in NAFLD phenotype and risk of progression. To date, at least three common genetic variants in the PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and GCKR genes have been robustly linked to NAFLD in the population. The function of these genes revealed novel pathways implicated in both the development and progression of NAFLD. In addition, candidate genes previously implicated in NAFLD pathogenesis have also been identified as determinants or modulators of NAFLD phenotype including genes involved in hepatocellular lipid handling, insulin resistance, inflammation, and fibrogenesis. This article will review the current understanding of the genetics underpinning the development of hepatic steatosis and the progression of NASH. These newly acquired insights may transform our strategy to risk-stratify patients with NAFLD and to identify new potential therapeutic targets.
Farjat-Pasos JI, Guedeney P, Horlick E, et al. Determinants of adverse outcomes following patent foramen ovale closure in elderly patients. EuroIntervention, 2024, 20(16): 1029-1038.
DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00156
2.
Wu G, Wu J, Lu Q, et al. Association between cardiovascular risk factors and atrial fibrillation. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2023, 10: 1110424.
DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1110424
3.
Kim HL, Lee EM, Ahn SY, et al. The 2022 focused update of the 2018 Korean Hypertension Society Guidelines for the management of hypertension. Clin Hypertens, 2023, 29(1): 11.
DOI:10.1186/s40885-023-00234-9
4.
Ma J, Chen Q, Ma S. Left atrial fibrosis in atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms, clinical evaluation and management. J Cell Mol Med, 2021, 25(6): 2764-2775.
DOI:10.1111/jcmm.16350
5.
Yun Y, Song H, Ji Y, et al. Identification of therapeutic drugs against COVID-19 through computational investigation on drug repurposing and structural modification. J Biomed Res, 2020, 34(6): 458-469.
DOI:10.7555/JBR.34.20200044
6.
Mascolo A, Urbanek K, De Angelis A, et al. Angiotensin II and angiotensin 1-7: which is their role in atrial fibrillation?. Heart Fail Rev, 2020, 25(2): 367-380.
DOI:10.1007/s10741-019-09837-7
7.
Alodhayani AA, Alkhushail A, Alhantoushi M, et al. Efficacy of treatment methods for uncontrolled hypertension and its effects on atrial fibrillation: A systematic narrative review. Int J Health Sci (Qassim), 2019, 13(6): 39-46.
8.
Omboni S, Volpe M. Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension and the Role of Olmesartan. Adv Ther, 2019, 36(2): 278-297.
DOI:10.1007/s12325-018-0859-x
9.
Aronow WS. Hypertension associated with atrial fibrillation. Ann Transl Med, 2017, 5(23): 457.
DOI:10.21037/atm.2017.10.33