
Citation: | Yingzhou Tu, Sen Wang, Haoran Wang, Peiyao Zhang, Mengyu Wang, Cunming Liu, Chun Yang, Riyue Jiang. The role of perioperative factors in the prognosis of cancer patients: A coin has two sides[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2025, 39(2): 117-127. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.38.20240164 |
Cancer, potentially the second leading cause of mortality globally, poses a significant health challenge. The conventional treatment for solid tumors typically involves surgical intervention, followed by chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapies. However, cancer recurrence and metastasis remain major issues. Anesthesia is essential for ensuring patient comfort and safety during surgery. Despite its crucial role in surgery, the precise effect of anesthesia on cancer patients' outcomes has not been clearly understood. This comprehensive review aims to elucidate perioperative anesthesia strategies for cancer patients and their potential effects on prognosis. Given the complexity of cancer treatments, understanding the relationship between anesthesia and cancer outcomes is crucial. By examining potential implications of anesthesia strategies for cancer prognosis, this review may help better understand treatment efficacy and risk factors for cancer recurrence and metastasis. Ultimately, a detailed analysis of anesthesia practices in cancer surgery may provide insights to refine existing anesthesia protocols and reduce risk factors for poor patient outcomes.
The first step in cellular response to external stimuli is the process by which proteins (receptors) presented in the cell membrane are stimulated, and relevant information is then transferred to the nucleus. The biochemical background of intracellular signal transduction is the phosphorylation of proteins (substrates) by the kinases. It is well-known that molecules constituting intracellular signaling pathways responsible for cellular responses are candidate molecular targets for the treatment of cancers[1–2], and a group of proteins in the correlation between kinases and their substrates have been investigated as the candidate targets.
There are methods to measure the phosphorylation state of various substrates to elucidate the phosphorylation pathways/targets. Mass spectrometry detects phosphorylated residues with a high sensitivity, but additional analyses, such as subtraction and tracing analyses, are needed to reveal changes in phosphorylation levels over time during intracellular events[3]. Other methods, such as reversed-phase protein arrays[4] and antibody array measurements[5], facilitate an accurate detection of phosphorylation, but the pathway analysis using these antibody-based measurements is dependent on the availability of specific antibodies, although their coverage has been recently improved[6]. In other words, there is a risk of arbitrary selection of appropriate methods by investigators in the measurements of protein phosphorylation.
Thus, we consider phosphorylation as a molecular event from the perspective of measurement data analysis, such as in data science and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Currently, the measurement of mRNA levels by microarrays and next-generation sequencers provides some important information on gene expression, while the measurement of DNA methylation levels provides important information on the regulation of gene expression. What is important about these measurements is that they are platform-type measurements, which allow measurements under various conditions by experimental investigators, and a large amount of information has been accumulated[7]. In addition, although not as standardized as the above-mentioned two types of measurements, it is possible to measure the amount of proteins and metabolites using mass spectrometers with a high precision, and some information on protein-protein interactions has also been accumulated[8]. Given this situation, it is expected that a platform-type measurement modality should be developed to investigate the phosphorylation state of the proteins responsible for signal transduction.
As a first step in the development of platform-based measurement modalities, we have developed a protein array that systematically and comprehensively measures the phosphorylation state of the proteins as well as a phosphorylation analysis system that also includes a mathematical system to analyze the measurement results. By using this platform, we have made novel discoveries regarding the efficacy of anticancer drugs[9–10] and the visualized time-series changes in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mediated signal transduction[11], and we also have compiled diverse phosphorylation variation patterns of kinase inhibitors[12]. In the current review, we introduce the workflow of our phosphorylation analysis system and illustrate an example of the target kinase estimation of inhibitors.
The phosphorylation array analysis platform reproduces the phosphorylation state in a sample under certain experimental conditions using a proprietary protein array, in which the characteristics of the phosphorylation state are extracted through mathematical analyses.
The phosphorylation protein array that we have developed carries 1471 proteins on a glass plate, comprising 273 signaling pathways[11] (Supplementary Data 1, available online). The pathways were selected by referencing the known signal transduction pathways of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)[13] and Reactome[14]. The correlation between kinases and substrates in these pathways was investigated with reference to PhosphoSitePlus[15], where 106 tyrosine kinases and 430 substrate proteins phosphorylated by these kinases (Supplementary Data 2, available online) had been found in 1471 proteins on the array. In addition, phosphorylation patterns had been measured and collected, when 167 commercial tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Supplementary Data 3, available online), including drugs, were administered to the phosphorylation arrays.
The workflow of the phosphorylation array analysis platform consists of the experimental measurement part of the phosphorylation reaction and its optical measurement, as well as the mathematical analysis part of the measured phosphorylation degrees (Fig. 1). When a sample is applied to the array, the proteins (substrates) on the array are phosphorylated according to the activation level of tyrosine kinases in the sample[11–12]. The levels of phosphorylation of these substrates are measured by the fluorescence intensity of the antibodies. In other words, the phosphorylation state of a protein in the cell is reproduced on the array according to the activation level of the kinase. The specific array preparation/measurement procedure is briefly summarized in Supplementary Data 4 (available online). From the measured phosphorylation levels of the substrates, the system outputs the differentially phosphorylated substrates among the samples, the activated phosphorylation pathways, the kinase activation levels, and the similarity or non-similarity to known kinase inhibitors. Especially in the case of candidate tyrosine kinase inhibitor samples, the target kinase of the candidate drug is estimated from the above-mentioned analyses.
The experimental measurement section of the analysis platform reproduces the phosphorylation state of the proteins in the sample. In other words, the levels of phosphorylation of a large number of substrates measured under the same conditions are outputted as numerical data. From the phosphorylation data of the substrates, relevant information on the phosphorylation state in the sample is extracted by mathematical analyses (Fig. 2). Each part of the mathematical analysis is described below.
First, the system estimates which substrates characteristically show variations in phosphorylation levels under the two compared conditions, such as healthy subjects and patients, or before and after compound administration.
The system employs three definitions for the variations between two conditions: the ratio of the measurements, the relative difference between the measurements by normalization to account for outliers in the measurements[16], and the difference in the ranks of the substrates in the total measurements[17]. Based on these three definitions, the significance probability of each measurement value is estimated, respectively. A composite probability is then computed from the three significance probabilities[18] and used as the significance probability of the substrate. This method allows the estimation of variations to be defined from multiple perspectives and eliminates arbitrary bias, because of the choice of a perspective from which to estimate significance.
The detected substrate groups may be useful in various directions. For example, these groups of substrates could be regarded as representatives of the conditions under which they were measured. Based on molecular functions of the substrate groups, they may be useful in elucidating biological functions of the sample under which conditions they were measured. Furthermore, because the substrates represent sample functions, they may also be regarded as candidate molecules for markers to classify the sample. In the case of pre- and post-drug administration data, they may considered to be candidates for drug efficacy markers; and in the case of data from healthy subjects and patients with a certain disease, they may considered to be candidates for diagnostic markers.
The novel array allows us to estimate the activation level of tyrosine kinases in a sample. Indeed, the inherent advantage of protein arrays is that changes in many protein groups are measured under the same conditions. Taking this advantage, we have developed a method to estimate the activation levels of 106 tyrosine kinases in a sample by mathematical analysis, based on the measured phosphorylation levels of 430 proteins, which are considered substrates for the 106 tyrosine kinases, among the 1471 substrates on the array[9–12]. The method is based on the following principles.
In general, one kinase phosphorylates different substrates, and the information on the pairs of kinases and their substrates has been accumulated in the database with the AI (neural net) model. With the input layer set to 1471 substrate phosphorylation levels and the output layer set to 106 kinase activation levels, the machine learning algorithm is applied as an intermediate layer based on the kinase/substrate-related knowledge. However, although kinase/substrate interactions are measured by various modalities, the content of kinase/substrate-related information varies. For example, in some information, kinase/substrate interactions are described only as binary relationships, while in others, the interaction information is measured as the amount of each protein. Therefore, the application of AI models requires validation of the kinase/substrate-related information based on the measurement of a larger number of array data.
As an initial step of estimation instead of AI network models, we assumed that, as a first approximation, the phosphorylation degrees of substrates were expressed by a linear combination of kinase activity as follows:
[p1p2⋮ps]=a1[δ11δ12⋮δ1s]+a2[δ21δ22⋮δ2s]+⋯+ak[δk1δk2⋮δks], |
(1) |
where pi (i = 1, 2, ···, s) and aj (j = 1, 2, ···, k) are the phosphorylation degrees of the s-th substrate and the phosphorylation activity of the k-th kinase, respectively. δks is the relationship between the k-th kinase and its s-th substrate, and is set as follows:
δks={1nk,ifproteinsisasubstrateofk-thkinase,andnsisatotalnumberofsubstratesofk-thkinase,0,otherwise. |
(2) |
In the present example, a total of 106 known tyrosine-kinases that possibly existed in cell lysate, and their substrates on the array, 430, as referred by PhosphositePlus[15], were equipped on the array. Because the number of equations was not equal to that of variables in the linear system of equations, rigorous solutions for {aj} were generally not obtained. Therefore, we obtained approximate values of {aj} from Equation (Eqn.) (1) in two ways. One way is that Eqn. (1) is described as a matrix form as follows:
→p=˜R→a. |
(3) |
In Eqn. (3), the problem was attributed to solving a system of the Moore-Penrose inverse matrix[19], for the phosphorylation activity of kinases {aj} from the measured phosphorylation degrees of substrates {pi} and the information on kinase-substrate pairs {δks}.
Another way is to use a linear regression on Eqn. (1). The values of {pi} were measured, and those of {δks} were set based on knowledge of the kinase/substrate relationship. Then, the problem of finding the values of {aj} could be attributed to the problem of finding a solution to a linear system of equations in excess conditions. It could obtain an approximate solution by linear regression analysis.
The platform is equipped with a proprietary analysis tool to estimate activation/inactivation pathways. This method estimates the activation of each pathway from the phosphorylation levels of its constituent proteins measured under certain conditions, based on the consistency between the graph structure and the measured data[20]. Here, we briefly summarize the pathway screening as follows.
First, we constructed sets of pathway connectivity (binary data) with reference to the pathway databases KEGG[13] and Reactome[14]. To estimate the activity by pathway screening for a directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure, we manually modified the original pathways according to the following rules.
1) The directions of arrows were set from the proteins in the plasma membrane to those in the nuclear membrane.
2) In the phosphorylation of a protein by a complex of proteins, the arrows were assumed from each of the constituent proteins in the complex protein to the protein.
3) In the pathway including a feedback loop, we separated one pathway into two pathways that were in the forward and backward directions.
Finally, we constructed 273 pathways of 1471 proteins with DAG structures.
Then, we calculated the graph consistency probability (GCP)[20], which expressed the consistency of a given network structure with the monitored data of the constituent proteins in the present example. The consistency of a DAG structure, G (Vi, Ej), where Vi is a vertex (i = 1, 2, ···, nv) and Ej is an edge (j = 1, 2, ···, ne) in the graph, and the joint density function f (Xi), corresponding to Vi for graph G with the measured data, is quantitatively expressed by the logarithm of the likelihood based on the Gaussian graphical model (GN: Gaussian Network)[21], i.e.,
l(G0)=lnnv∏i=1f(Xi|pa{Xi})=−12nv∑i=1ni∑j=1{1σ2im∑k=1(xik−ni∑j=1βijxkj)2+ln(2πσ2i)}, |
(4) |
where pa{Xi} is the set of variables corresponding to the parents of Vi in the graph, xik is the measured value of Xi at the k-th point, and ni is the number of variables corresponding to the parents of Vi. Here, the joint density function, f (Xi), in the equation is expressed by the regression for the measured data. Because the likelihood depends on the graph size, we designed a simple procedure to transform the likelihood into the probability for the activation of the graph consistency with the data[20]. Indeed, we generated Nr networks under the condition that the networks shared the same numbers of nodes and edges as those of the given networks. Then, we defined GCP as follows:
GCP=NsNr, |
(5) |
where Ns is the number of networks with a log-likelihood larger than the log-likelihood of the tested network. In this study, Nr was set to 1000, and the GCP significance of the given network was set at 0.1.
A variety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors are currently available for purchase, including compounds approved for pharmaceutical use. We prepared 167 tyrosine kinase inhibitors and measured their phosphorylation patterns in arrays (Fig. 3). In this process, the variation in phosphorylation levels was calculated in two ways: the ratio and difference before and after administration. The datasets of variation in the two ways were then compiled.
Based on this dataset, it is possible to estimate which tyrosine kinase inhibitors have similar phosphorylation patterns using a unique network technique. Furthermore, this estimation provides some useful information about compound targets. The network analysis based on phosphorylation patterns is as follows.
The correlation between gene expression and drug efficacy was uncovered by the Broad Institute in the connectivity map[22] and the following Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS, https://lincsproject.org/) program. The direction of gene expression correlation between normal and disease was reversed in response to drug treatment, even for a few types of commercial cell lines, by the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)[23], which estimates the distribution bias of a set of genes against the whole gene distribution. Because of the GSEA methodology, the Broad system needs approximately 1000 genes to estimate its reverse correlation. In contrast to the Broad system, we have developed another method for detecting the reverse correlation of gene expression between disease and drug efficacy, named "Cyber Drug Discovery"[23]. In our system, for example, we estimated that the drug candidates were negatively correlated with the disease by network analysis, followed by the detection of differentially expressed genes between normal controls and patients with a target disease by our original method[16].
It is easy to apply our network analysis system for phosphorylation analysis. We may measure the phosphorylation variation pattern in a query compound and incorporate it into the known tyrosine kinase inhibitor variation pattern data as a query pattern. In other words, the newly measured data are considered the 168th dataset. A network analysis is performed on this dataset to estimate the association between the new sample and the 167 known tyrosine kinase inhibitors. If the new sample is found to be associated with a known tyrosine kinase inhibitor, then the properties of the new query compound are considered likely to be similar to the known tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
One of the goals of using this array is to determine whether a compound targets a kinase with an unknown function. To achieve this, the system has methods to estimate the target kinase from different perspectives.
Once the differentially phosphorylated substrates are identified, knowledge of the kinase/substrate interaction is used to determine which kinase substrate groups are specifically inhibited. Once the kinase activity is estimated, the group of kinases with a reduced activation is directly a candidate for the target kinase of the inhibitor. Once the active pathway is estimated, the group of substrates contained in the inactivated pathway is known, and the question of which target kinase may be answered from knowledge of the kinase/substrate interactions. Finally, if a similarity to a known inhibitor is found, the inhibitory target kinase of a similar known inhibitor is considered the inhibitory target kinase of the sample. As described above, this system provides multiple perspectives for selecting drug candidates with potential inhibitory target kinases.
Apart from the target identification of query compounds, the system also provides tools for a clear understanding of dosing effects. Tools to visualize the entire pathway are also provided.
For the phosphorylation levels of 1471 proteins, which are the primary information obtained from the experimental measurements, a heatmap was created to visualize the overall changes. For the activation levels of the 273 pathways, it is necessary to use dedicated visualization software to obtain an overall picture. For this purpose, we further developed software that could seamlessly visualize the estimation results according to the framework of the cell structure, by using the localization information of the pathway component proteins and the binary correlation data of the pathway structure based on the activation pathway estimation results in the previous section. The 273 pathways were classified into 27 categories with reference to the Reactome Pathway Database[14], and in each category, the activated pathways were visualized. Specific visualizations are illustrated in the next section.
An example of adapting the platform to an actual inhibitor target kinase is to measure the phosphorylation states before and after dasatinib administration. Dasatinib binds to the ATP-binding site of the BCR-ABL fusion protein and competes with ATP at the ATP-binding site. Dasatinib also binds SRC family kinases (SRC, LCK, YES, and FYN), c-KIT (KIT), ephrin (EPH) receptor A2 (EPHA2), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-β receptor (PDGFRB) to compete with ATP at the ATP binding site in the kinase domain of the above tyrosine kinase[24]. The approved indications of dasatinib are chronic myelogenous leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Using our analytical methods, we may examine whether our pre- and post-dose data predict the administered inhibitor dasatinib and whether the above target proteins may be identified as targets.
First, the visualization tool was used to intuitively capture the phosphorylation state changes before and after dasatinib administration. A heatmap of the changes before and after dasatinib administration is shown (Fig. 4). As is evident from the figure, different phosphorylation levels of some substrates on the array were detected before and after dasatinib administration. It was also observed that the inhibitor treatment with dasatinib did not increase the levels of phosphorylation of many substrates but rather decreased them. We visualized the activation of pathways categorized as "Integrin signaling" (Fig. 4), one of the 27 categories comprising 273 pathways. These integrin-related pathways were visible in each condition before and after administration. However, the integrin active pathway was only observed after treatment, not before treatment, indicating that dasatinib activated the integrin-related pathway. The other 26 categories were also visualized in the same way, so that the activation pathways before and after treatment may be intuitively understood.
Based on these data, we could estimate the kinases that were inhibited. First, we selected kinases whose activity was decreased by dasatinib treatment (Fig. 5). We also estimated the activation level of the kinase in each of the DMSO and dasatinib conditions. When the activation level was lower in DMSO than in dasatinib, the kinase might be a target whose activity was suppressed by dasatinib, and vice versa, the kinase might be involved in bypass by dasatinib administration. As a result, we found that the activity was specifically decreased in seven kinases, among which PDGFRB, a known target of dasatinib, was found. Furthermore, with reference to the inhibitor/target-kinase correlation, inhibitors targeting these seven kinases were 24 out of 106. Many inhibitors showed kinases similar to those inhibited by dasatinib, such as ABL, KIT, and PDGFRB[24].
Inhibitors showing similar phosphorylation patterns were also estimated from the data before and after dasatinib treatment. Inhibitors showing correlated patterns were searched for by network analysis[25] for the datasets of the variability ratios and differences before and after inhibitor treatment (Fig. 6). We extracted the network where the measured dasatinib ("M") was connected to the dasatinib ("Dasatinib_hydrochloride") stored in the datasets. As shown in Fig. 6, the newly measured dasatinib was connected to dasatinib in the phosphorylation datasets. Indeed, in the raw subtraction data of phosphorylation, the newly measured dasatinib was connected to UM_164 with a negative correlation, and UM_164 was connected to dasatinib in the dataset with a negative correlation. In the ratio data of phosphorylation, the newly measured dasatinib was directly connected to dasatinib in the dataset set with a positive correlation. This indicated that dasatinib was successfully detected by this system and had the potential to identify the target of query inhibitors.
In the present review, we provide an overview of the phosphorylation analysis platform "Phospho-Totum" that we have developed. Using this platform, we may estimate the activation or inactivation pathways by compound administration and the activity of the kinase in any type of samples, such as blood and tissues. Additionally, a dataset of known tyrosine kinase inhibitors was used to estimate known compounds that show similar kinase activation levels to the administered compound. These results also indicate that our phosphorylation analysis platform provides useful information for target identification of compounds. For example, the performance of our system was evaluated by estimating the pathway activity of epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulation and (EGFR) pharmacological inhibition[11]. As a result, by accurately measuring the phosphorylation levels of the constituent proteins on the array, the pathway activity upon EGF stimulation and EGFR inhibition was successfully traced along the time axis of the relevant pathway from the outer membrane to the nucleus.
In addition to drug discovery, this platform may also be useful in two additional tasks: the elucidation of disease mechanisms involving signal transduction and the discovery of disease and drug markers. Estimating the activation pathways and kinase activation levels in healthy subjects and patients helps to identify key molecular events involved in the pathophysiological process of disease. For example, using this analysis platform and patient-derived lung cancer cells, we found that activation of the insulin-like growth factor receptor type 1 pathway mediated by insulin-like growth factor 2 autocrine was a common clinically associated mechanism of the acquired resistance to osimertinib[10]. Furthermore, substrates that specifically fluctuate before and after the administration of drug candidates may be considered candidate markers. Exploring even more phosphorylation drug markers may provide an alternative to gene mutation-based drug efficacy diagnostic tools for individual patients. In sum, this platform will provide new answers to various questions with a different approach than conventional phosphorylation analysis modalities, such as antibody arrays and mass spectrometry.
In general, the AI approach requires larger amounts of data than statistical approaches. At this stage, the training data are not yet sufficiently developed to make the full-scale use of AI tools[26]. There was only one type of array, with only approximately 1000 arrays measured thus far, and furthermore, only 167 data pointed on kinase inhibitor administration at one time point (6 h after administration) and one concentration (optimal concentration of each drug); however, despite such a small amount of data, we were able to estimate the target with a high accuracy in the presented example. This will further enable the use of AI tools, if the measured data of the array of phosphorylation should be accumulated in the future. The present system is expected to evolve into a prediction system that may estimate targets based on the similarity of kinase activation and inhibition patterns, as well as disease or drug effect markers with a high accuracy, simply by inputting array measurement data.
This study was supported by the Innovative and Entrepreneurial Team of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. JSSCTD202144), the Nanjing Postdoctoral Program (Grant No. BSHNJ2023006), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82201380).
The authors would like to express the deepest gratitude to all those who have supported us throughout the process of this paper.
The authors are grateful to our colleagues and peers for their constructive criticism and encouragement.
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful remarks.
CLC number: R730.7, Document code: A
The authors reported no conflict of interests.
[1] |
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
|
[2] |
Dillekås H, Rogers MS, Straume O. Are 90% of deaths from cancer caused by metastases?[J]. Cancer Med, 2019, 8(12): 5574–5576. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2474
|
[3] |
Yap A, Lopez-Olivo MA, Dubowitz J, et al. Anesthetic technique and cancer outcomes: a meta-analysis of total intravenous versus volatile anesthesia[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2019, 66(5): 546–561. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01330-x
|
[4] |
Smith L, Cata JP, Forget P. Immunological insights into opioid-free anaesthesia in oncological surgery: a scoping review[J]. Curr Oncol Rep, 2022, 24(10): 1327–1336. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01300-5
|
[5] |
Illias AM, Yu K, Wu S, et al. Association of regional anesthesia with oncological outcomes in patients receiving surgery for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1097637. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1097637
|
[6] |
Xu Y, Pan S, Jiang W, et al. Effects of propofol on the development of cancer in humans[J]. Cell Prolif, 2020, 53(8): e12867. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12867
|
[7] |
Hu C, Iwasaki M, Liu Z, et al. Lung but not brain cancer cell malignancy inhibited by commonly used anesthetic propofol during surgery: implication of reducing cancer recurrence risk[J]. J Adv Res, 2021, 31: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.12.007
|
[8] |
Sun C, Liu P, Pei L, et al. Propofol inhibits proliferation and augments the anti-tumor effect of doxorubicin and paclitaxel partly through promoting ferroptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 837974. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.837974
|
[9] |
Sun N, Zhang W, Liu J, et al. Propofol inhibits the progression of cervical cancer by regulating HOTAIR/miR-129–5p/RPL14 axis[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2021, 14: 551–564. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S279942
|
[10] |
Wu Z, Wang H, Shi Z, et al. Propofol prevents the growth, migration, invasion, and glycolysis of colorectal cancer cells by downregulating lactate dehydrogenase both in vitro and in vivo[J]. J Oncol, 2022, 2022: 8317466. doi: 10.1155/2022/8317466
|
[11] |
Hu C, Wang B, Liu Z, et al. Sevoflurane but not propofol enhances ovarian cancer cell biology through regulating cellular metabolic and signaling mechanisms[J]. Cell Biol Toxicol, 2023, 39(4): 1395–1411. doi: 10.1007/s10565-022-09766-6
|
[12] |
Xu Y, Du Q, Zhang M, et al. Propofol suppresses proliferation, invasion and angiogenesis by down-regulating ERK-VEGF/MMP-9 signaling in Eca-109 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2013, 17(18): 2486–2494. doi: 10.1358/dof.2013.38.9.2040082
|
[13] |
Zhao H, Wei H, He J, et al. Propofol disrupts cell carcinogenesis and aerobic glycolysis by regulating circTADA2A/miR-455-3p/FOXM1 axis in lung cancer[J]. Cell Cycle, 2020, 19(19): 2538–2552. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2020.1810393
|
[14] |
Fang P, Zhou J, Xia Z, et al. Effects of propofol versus sevoflurane on postoperative breast cancer prognosis: a narrative review[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 793093. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35127500/
|
[15] |
Gu L, Pan X, Wang C, et al. The benefits of propofol on cancer treatment: Decipher its modulation code to immunocytes[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13: 919636. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.919636
|
[16] |
Zhou M, Dai J, Zhou Y, et al. Propofol improves the function of natural killer cells from the peripheral blood of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2018, 16(1): 83–92. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6140
|
[17] |
Wang P, Chen J, Mu LH, et al. Propofol inhibits invasion and enhances paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells through the suppression of the transcription factor slug[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2013, 17(13): 1722–1729. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202111_27139
|
[18] |
Han B, Liu Y, Zhang Q, et al. Propofol decreases cisplatin resistance of non-small cell lung cancer by inducing GPX4-mediated ferroptosis through the miR-744–5p/miR-615–3p axis[J]. J Proteomics, 2023, 274: 104777. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2022.104777
|
[19] |
Duan W, Hu J, Liu Y. Ketamine inhibits colorectal cancer cells malignant potential via blockage of NMDA receptor[J]. Exp Mol Pathol, 2019, 107: 171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2019.02.004
|
[20] |
Hu J, Duan W, Liu Y. Ketamine inhibits aerobic glycolysis in colorectal cancer cells by blocking the NMDA receptor-CaMK II-c-Myc pathway[J]. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol, 2020, 47(5): 848–856. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13248
|
[21] |
Zhou X, Zhang P, Luo W, et al. Ketamine induces apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma cells by regulating the expression of CD69[J]. Cancer Med, 2018, 7(3): 788–795. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1288
|
[22] |
Malsy M, Gebhardt K, Gruber M, et al. Effects of ketamine, s-ketamine, and MK 801 on proliferation, apoptosis, and necrosis in pancreatic cancer cells[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2015, 15: 111. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0076-y
|
[23] |
He H, Chen J, Xie W, et al. Ketamine used as an acesodyne in human breast cancer therapy causes an undesirable side effect, upregulating anti-apoptosis protein Bcl-2 expression[J]. Genet Mol Res, 2013, 12(2): 1907–1915. doi: 10.4238/2013.January.4.7
|
[24] |
Ponferrada AR, Orriach JLG, Manso AM, et al. Anaesthesia and cancer: can anaesthetic drugs modify gene expression?[J]. Ecancermedicalscience, 2020, 14: 1080. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1080
|
[25] |
Ackerman RS, Luddy KA, Icard BE, et al. The effects of anesthetics and perioperative medications on immune function: a narrative review[J]. Anesth Analg, 2021, 133(3): 676–689. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005607
|
[26] |
Wang F, Lau JKC, Yu J. The role of natural killer cell in gastrointestinal cancer: killer or helper[J]. Oncogene, 2021, 40(4): 717–730. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-01561-z
|
[27] |
Dang Y, Shi X, Xu W, et al. The effect of anesthesia on the immune system in colorectal cancer patients[J]. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 2018: 7940603. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29805965/
|
[28] |
Angka L, Khan ST, Kilgour MK, et al. Dysfunctional natural killer cells in the aftermath of cancer surgery[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2017, 18(8): 1787. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081787
|
[29] |
Stollings LM, Jia L, Tang P, et al. Immune modulation by volatile anesthetics[J]. Anesthesiology, 2016, 125(2): 399–411. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001195
|
[30] |
Fröhlich D, Rothe G, Schwall B, et al. Effects of volatile anaesthetics on human neutrophil oxidative response to the bacterial peptide FMLP[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997, 78(6): 718–723. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.6.718
|
[31] |
Markovic SN, Knight PR, Murasko DM. Inhibition of interferon stimulation of natural killer cell activity in mice anesthetized with halothane or isoflurane[J]. Anesthesiology, 1993, 78(4): 700–706. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199304000-00013
|
[32] |
Tavare AN, Perry NJS, Benzonana LL, et al. Cancer recurrence after surgery: direct and indirect effects of anesthetic agents[J]. Int J Cancer, 2012, 130(6): 1237–1250. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26448
|
[33] |
Shi Q, Zhang S, Liu L, et al. Sevoflurane promotes the expansion of glioma stem cells through activation of hypoxia-inducible factors in vitro[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2015, 114(5): 825–830. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu402
|
[34] |
Benzonana LL, Perry NJS, Watts HR, et al. Isoflurane, a commonly used volatile anesthetic, enhances renal cancer growth and malignant potential via the hypoxia-inducible factor cellular signaling pathway in vitro[J]. Anesthesiology, 2013, 119(3): 593–605. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829e47fd
|
[35] |
Zhu M, Li M, Zhou Y, et al. Isoflurane enhances the malignant potential of glioblastoma stem cells by promoting their viability, mobility in vitro and migratory capacity in vivo[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2016, 116(6): 870–877. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew124
|
[36] |
Alsina E, Matute E, Ruiz-Huerta AD, et al. The effects of sevoflurane or remifentanil on the stress response to surgical stimulus[J]. Curr Pharm Des, 2014, 20(34): 5449–5468. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140325105723
|
[37] |
Wigmore T, Farquhar-Smith P. Opioids and cancer: friend or foe?[J]. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care, 2016, 10(2): 109–118. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000208
|
[38] |
Shavit Y, Ben-Eliyahu S, Zeidel A, et al. Effects of fentanyl on natural killer cell activity and on resistance to tumor metastasis in rats: dose and timing study[J]. Neuroimmunomodulation, 2004, 11(4): 255–260. doi: 10.1159/000078444
|
[39] |
Shavit Y, Lewis JW, Terman GW, et al. Opioid peptides mediate the suppressive effect of stress on natural killer cell cytotoxicity[J]. Science, 1984, 223(4632): 188–190. doi: 10.1126/science.6691146
|
[40] |
Lucia M, Luca T, Federica DP, et al. Opioids and breast cancer recurrence: a systematic review[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(21): 5499. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215499
|
[41] |
Nguyen J, Luk K, Vang D, et al. Morphine stimulates cancer progression and mast cell activation and impairs survival in transgenic mice with breast cancer[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2014, 113 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): i4–i13.
|
[42] |
Yuval JB, Lee J, Wu F, et al. Intraoperative opioids are associated with decreased recurrence rates in colon adenocarcinoma: a retrospective observational cohort study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2022, 129(2): 172–181. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.04.024
|
[43] |
Sessler DI, Pei L, Huang Y, et al. Recurrence of breast cancer after regional or general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2019, 394(10211): 1807–1815. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32313-X
|
[44] |
Montagna G, Gupta HV, Hannum M, et al. Intraoperative opioids are associated with improved recurrence-free survival in triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2021, 126(2): 367–376. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.021
|
[45] |
Rangel FP, Auler JOC, Carmona MJC, et al. Opioids and premature biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a randomised prospective clinical trial[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2021, 126(5): 931–939. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.031
|
[46] |
Kolawole OR, Kashfi K. NSAIDs and cancer resolution: new paradigms beyond cyclooxygenase[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(3): 1432. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031432
|
[47] |
Hashemi Goradel N, Najafi M, Salehi E, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 in cancer: a review[J]. J Cell Physiol, 2019, 234(5): 5683–5699. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27411
|
[48] |
Fan X, Wang S, Pan K, et al. Selective COX-2 inhibitor is beneficial in suppressing chronic postsurgical pain in esophageal cancer patients and may prolong patient survival[J]. Oncol Res Treat, 2023, 46(12): 503–510. doi: 10.1159/000535183
|
[49] |
Zhang Z, Ghosh A, Connolly PJ, et al. Gut-restricted selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors for chemoprevention of colorectal cancer[J]. J Med Chem, 2021, 64(15): 11570–11596. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00890
|
[50] |
Meyerhardt JA, Shi Q, Fuchs CS, et al. Effect of celecoxib vs placebo added to standard adjuvant therapy on disease-free survival among patients with stage Ⅲ colon cancer: the CALGB/SWOG 80702 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2021, 325(13): 1277–1286. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.2454
|
[51] |
Ramirez MF, Tran P, Cata JP. The effect of clinically therapeutic plasma concentrations of lidocaine on natural killer cell cytotoxicity[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2015, 40(1): 43–48. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000191
|
[52] |
Wall TP, Buggy DJ. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine and metastatic cancer recurrence—a narrative review[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 688896. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.688896
|
[53] |
Xing W, Chen D, Pan J, et al. Lidocaine induces apoptosis and suppresses tumor growth in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro and in a xenograft model in vivo[J]. Anesthesiology, 2017, 126(5): 868–881. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001528
|
[54] |
Zhang C, Xie C, Lu Y. Local anesthetic lidocaine and cancer: insight into tumor progression and recurrence[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 669746. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.669746
|
[55] |
Zhang H, Yang L, Zhu X, et al. Association between intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion and survival in patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2020, 125(2): 141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.034
|
[56] |
Zhang H, Qu M, Guo K, et al. Intraoperative lidocaine infusion in patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a mechanistic, multicentre randomised clinical trial[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2022, 129(2): 244–253. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.031
|
[57] |
Zhang H, Gu J, Qu M, et al. Effects of intravenous infusion of lidocaine on short-term outcomes and survival in patients undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer: a retrospective propensity score matching study[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 689832. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35070949/
|
[58] |
Hayden JM, Oras J, Block L, et al. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine reduces time interval to initiation of chemotherapy after surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: randomised controlled double-blind pilot study[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2020, 124(5): 562–570. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.01.026
|
[59] |
Dubowitz JA, Sloan EK, Riedel BJ. Implicating anaesthesia and the perioperative period in cancer recurrence and metastasis[J]. Clin Exp Metastasis, 2018, 35(4): 347–358. doi: 10.1007/s10585-017-9862-x
|
[60] |
Kim R, Kawai A, Wakisaka M, et al. Current status and prospects of anesthesia and breast cancer: does anesthetic technique affect recurrence and survival rates in breast cancer surgery?[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 795864. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.795864
|
[61] |
Seo KH, Hong JH, Moon MH, et al. Effect of total intravenous versus inhalation anesthesia on long-term oncological outcomes in patients undergoing curative resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2023, 76(4): 336–347. doi: 10.4097/kja.22584
|
[62] |
Wu Z, Lee MS, Wong CS, et al. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in colon cancer surgery[J]. Anesthesiology, 2018, 129(5): 932–941. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002357
|
[63] |
Kim MH, Kim DW, Kim JH, et al. Does the type of anesthesia really affect the recurrence-free survival after breast cancer surgery?[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(52): 90477–90487. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21014
|
[64] |
Cao S, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Long-term survival in older patients given propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia for major cancer surgery: follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2023, 131(2): 266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.023
|
[65] |
Chiu WC, Wu Z, Lee MS, et al. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with less postoperative recurrence than desflurane anesthesia in thyroid cancer surgery[J]. PLoS One, 2024, 19(1): e0296169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296169
|
[66] |
Chang C, Wu M, Chien YJ, et al. Anesthesia and long-term oncological outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Anesth Analg, 2021, 132(3): 623–634. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005237
|
[67] |
Dockrell L, Buggy DJ. The role of regional anaesthesia in the emerging subspecialty of onco-anaesthesia: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Anaesthesia, 2021, 76 Suppl 1: 148–159.
|
[68] |
Wang L, Liang S, Chen H, et al. The effects of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia on T lymphocytes differentiation markers and cytokines in patients after gastric cancer resection[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2019, 19(1): 102. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0778-7
|
[69] |
Xu Z, Li H, Li M, et al. Epidural anesthesia-analgesia and recurrence-free survival after lung cancer surgery: a randomized trial[J]. Anesthesiology, 2021, 135(3): 419–432. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003873
|
[70] |
Du Y, Li Y, Zhao B, et al. Long-term survival after combined epidural-general anesthesia or general anesthesia alone: follow-up of a randomized trial[J]. Anesthesiology, 2021, 135(2): 233–245. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003835
|
[71] |
Zhang J, Chang CL, Lu C, et al. Paravertebral block in regional anesthesia with propofol sedation reduces locoregional recurrence in patients with breast cancer receiving breast conservative surgery compared with volatile inhalational without propofol in general anesthesia[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2021, 142: 111991. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111991
|
[72] |
Baba Y, Kikuchi E, Shigeta K, et al. Effects of transurethral resection under general anesthesia on tumor recurrence in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2021, 26(11): 2094–2103. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02000-z
|
[73] |
Younes RN, Rogatko A, Brennan MF. The influence of intraoperative hypotension and perioperative blood transfusion on disease-free survival in patients with complete resection of colorectal liver metastases[J]. Ann Surg, 1991, 214(2): 107–113. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199108000-00003
|
[74] |
Park B, Jeong BC, Seo SI, et al. Influence of body mass index, smoking, and blood pressure on survival of patients with surgically-treated, low stage renal cell carcinoma: a 14-year retrospective cohort study[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2013, 28(2): 227–236. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.2.227
|
[75] |
Blajchman MA. Transfusion immunomodulation or TRIM: what does it mean clinically?[J]. Hematology, 2005, 10 Suppl 1: 208–214.
|
[76] |
Blajchman MA, Bardossy L, Carmen R, et al. Allogeneic blood transfusion-induced enhancement of tumor growth: two animal models showing amelioration by leukodepletion and passive transfer using spleen cells[J]. Blood, 1993, 81(7): 1880–1882. doi: 10.1182/blood.V81.7.1880.1880
|
[77] |
Nakayama H, Okamura Y, Higaki T, et al. Effect of blood product transfusion on the prognosis of patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2023, 58(2): 171–181. doi: 10.1007/s00535-022-01946-9
|
[78] |
Hsu FK, Chang WK, Lin K, et al. The associations between perioperative blood transfusion and long-term outcomes after stomach cancer surgery[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(21): 5438. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215438
|
[79] |
Hee HZ, Chang K, Huang CY, et al. Perioperative blood transfusion is dose-dependently associated with cancer recurrence and mortality after head and neck cancer surgery[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2022, 15(1): 99. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010099
|
[80] |
Tai YH, Wu HL, Mandell MS, et al. The association of non-small cell lung cancer recurrence with allogenic blood transfusion after surgical resection: a propensity score analysis of 1, 803 patients[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2020, 140: 45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.004
|
[81] |
Turri G, Pedrazzani C, Malerba G, et al. Effect of peri-operative blood transfusions on long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Blood Transfus, 2022, 20(2): 103–111. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33370231/
|
[82] |
Xia S, Zhou D, Ge F, et al. Influence of perioperative anesthesia on cancer recurrence: from basic science to clinical practice[J]. Curr Oncol Rep, 2023, 25(2): 63–81. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01342-9
|
[83] |
Appenheimer MM, Evans SS. Temperature and adaptive immunity[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2018, 156: 397–415. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780444639127000242
|
[84] |
Zeba S, Surbatovic M, Stanojevic I, et al. The effects of intraoperative hypothermia on cytokine profile: a randomized pilot study[J]. J Clin Anesth, 2020, 63: 109779. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109779
|
[85] |
Nduka CC, Puttick M, Coates P, et al. Intraperitoneal hypothermia during surgery enhances postoperative tumor growth[J]. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(4): 611–615. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9055-0
|
[86] |
Morozumi K, Mitsuzuka K, Takai Y, et al. Intraoperative hypothermia is a significant prognostic predictor of radical cystectomy especially for stage II muscle-invasive bladder cancer[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(2): e13962. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013962
|
[87] |
Lyon TD, Frank I, Tollefson MK, et al. Association of intraoperative hypothermia with oncologic outcomes following radical cystectomy[J]. Urol Oncol, 2021, 39(6): 370. e1–370. e8.
|
[88] |
Repasky EA, Evans SS, Dewhirst MW. Temperature matters! And why it should matter to tumor immunologists[J]. Cancer Immunol Res, 2013, 1(4): 210–216. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0118
|
[89] |
Tang X, Cao F, Ma W, et al. Cancer cells resist hyperthermia due to its obstructed activation of caspase 3[J]. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2020, 25(3): 323–326. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.02.008
|
[1] | Gege Yuan, Jiachen Wang, Shuangshuang Qiu, Yunfei Zhu, Qing Cheng, Laihua Li, Jiahao Sha, Xiaoyu Yang, Yan Yuan. Title: Improving in vitro induction efficiency of human primordial germ cell-like cells using N2B27 or NAC-based medium[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.38.20240433 |
[2] | Tiwari-Heckler Shilpa, Jiang Z. Gordon, Popov Yury, J. Mukamal Kenneth. Daily high-dose aspirin does not lower APRI in the Aspirin-Myocardial Infarction Study[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2020, 34(2): 139-142. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.33.20190041 |
[3] | Minbo Zang, Qiao Zhou, Yunfei Zhu, Mingxi Liu, Zuomin Zhou. Effects of chemotherapeutic agent bendamustine for nonhodgkin lymphoma on spermatogenesis in mice[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(6): 442-453. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20170023 |
[4] | Huanqiang Wang, Congying Yang, Siyuan Wang, Tian Wang, Jingling Han, Kai Wei, Fucun Liu, Jida Xu, Xianzhen Peng, Jianming Wang. Cell-free plasma hypermethylated CASZ1, CDH13 and ING2 are promising biomarkers of esophageal cancer[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(6): 424-433. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.32.20170065 |
[5] | Fengzhen Wang, Mingwan Zhang, Dongsheng Zhang, Yuan Huang, Li Chen, Sunmin Jiang, Kun Shi, Rui Li. Preparation, optimization, and characterization of chitosancoated solid lipid nanoparticles for ocular drug delivery[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(6): 411-423. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.32.20160170 |
[6] | Eika S. Webb, Peng Liu, Renato Baleeiro, Nicholas R. Lemoine, Ming Yuan, Yaohe Wang. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(5): 317-326. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20160168 |
[7] | Ahmad R. Safa, Mohammad Reza Saadatzadeh, Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol, Karen E. Pollok, Khadijeh Bijangi-Vishehsaraei. Emerging targets for glioblastoma stem cell therapy[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2016, 30(1): 19-31. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.30.20150100 |
[8] | Yansong Lin. Internal radiation therapy: a neglected aspect of nuclear medicine in the molecular era[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2015, 29(5): 345-355. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.29.20140069 |
[9] | Chung S Yang, Qing Feng. Chemo/Dietary prevention of cancer: perspectives in China[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2014, 28(6): 447-455. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.28.20140079 |
[10] | Bo Cui, Stewart P. Johnson, Nancy Bullock, Francis Ali-Osman, Darell D. Bigner, Henry S. Friedman. Decoupling of DNA damage response signaling from DNA damages underlies temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2010, 24(6): 424-435. DOI: 10.1016/S1674-8301(10)60057-7 |
1. | Wang L, Dos Santos Sanches N, Panahipour L, et al. Dimethyl Fumarate-Loaded Gellan Gum Hydrogels Can Reduce In Vitro Chemokine Expression in Oral Cells. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(17): 9485. DOI:10.3390/ijms25179485 |