4.6

CiteScore

2.2

Impact Factor
  • ISSN 1674-8301
  • CN 32-1810/R
Hashemi Mohammad, Hasanpour Vahed, Danesh Hiva, Bizhani Fatemeh, Narouie Behzad. Association between Pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism and bladder cancer risk[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2019, 33(1): 24-29. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20170044
Citation: Hashemi Mohammad, Hasanpour Vahed, Danesh Hiva, Bizhani Fatemeh, Narouie Behzad. Association between Pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism and bladder cancer risk[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2019, 33(1): 24-29. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20170044

Association between Pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism and bladder cancer risk

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Mohammad Hashemi, PhD, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Sistan and Baluchistan 98167-43181, Iran. Tel/Fax: + 98-5433295791/+ 98-5433295796, E-mail: mhd.hashemi@gmail.com/ hashemim@zaums.ac.ir

  • Received Date: April 06, 2017
  • Revised Date: May 18, 2017
  • Accepted Date: August 22, 2017
  • Available Online: October 09, 2017
  • Several studies examined the impact of miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism and cancer risk, but the findings are inconsistent. However, no study has been conducted to inspect the impact of miR-34b/c polymorphism on bladder cancer. This study aimed to assess possible association between rs4938723 polymorphism and bladder cancer risk. This case-control study was done on 136 pathologically proven bladder cancer patients and 144 controls. Genotyping of Pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism was achieved by using the polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Our findings did not show any statistically significant differences in genotype and allele frequencies between bladder cancer and controls. Larger sample sizes with diverse ethnicities are required to validate our findings.
  • Bladder cancer is the ninth most common malignancy in the world, and the fourth most common cancer in the United States[1]. Men are more than four times more likely to get bladder cancer than women. Bladder cancer has a multifactorial etiology. It has been proposed that the development of bladder cancer is a result of environmental factors such as smoking, occupational exposure to carcinogens, obesity, physical inactivity[2-4], genetic variants and the interaction of genes with the external factors[5-8].

    MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small singlestranded noncoding RNA molecules that play key roles in a variety of cellular processes by targeting mRNAs for cleavage or translational repression[9-10]. The data provides strong evidence that dysregulation of miRNAs expression affects the tumorigenesis by acting as oncogenes or tumor suppressors[11-15]. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in miRNAs can affect cancer susceptibility by disturbing miRNAs biosynthesis and expression, altering mature miRNAs, or by combining with target genes[16-19].

    The miR-34 family members comprises miR-34a, miR-34b, and miR-34c that are encoded by two different primary miRNAs. The miR-34a is encoded by its own transcript, while the miR-34b and miR-34c are encoded by a shared primary transcript (pri-miR-34b/c)[20]. A potentially functional rs4938723 variant (T to C substitution), located in the promoter region of primiR-34b/c, may affect miR-34b/c expression via genetic and epigenetic mechanisms and in turn influence the individual susceptibility to cancer[21-23]. Though the association between miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism and the risk of developing several cancers were reported in various case-control studies[20, 23-34], but to the best of our knowledge, there is no report concerning the impact of miR-34b/c rs4938723 variant on the risk of bladder cancer. Accordingly, this case-control study was aimed to evaluate the possible association between pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism and susceptibility to bladder cancer in a sample from the Iranian population.

    A total of 136 patients with histopathologically confirmed papillary urothelial cancers of the bladder and 144 healthy controls were enrolled in this casecontrol study. The study design and recruitment procedures were described previously[35]. All participants were from the Department of Urology, Shahid Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The local ethics committee of Zahedan University of Medical sciences approved the project and informed us that written consent was obtained from all of the study participants. The genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood cells using the salting-out method[36].

    Genotyping of the Pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism was done by a polymerase chain reactionrestriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) technique as explained previously[37]. Briefly, the forward and reverse primers to amplify the Pri-miR-34b/c gene sequences containing the rs4938723 polymorphisms were 5′-CCTCTGGGAACCTTCTTTGACCTGT-3′ and 5′-CCTGGGCCTTCTAGTCAAATAGTGA-3′, respectively. PCR amplification was done using Prime Taq Premix (Genet Bio, Korea) by the following amplification procedure: denaturation at 95 ℃ for 5 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of 95 ℃ for 30 seconds, 57 ℃ for 30 seconds, 72 ℃ for 30 seconds, with a final extension of 10 minutes at 72 ℃. Ten microliters of the PCR products of 212 bp fragments were digested by NmuCI restriction enzyme (Fermentas) and separated by 2.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The T allele was undigested (212 bp fragment), but the C allele digested and produced two fragments of 186 and 26 bp (Fig. 1).

    Figure  1.  Genotypes of pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723.
    M: DNA marker; lanes 1, 2: CC genotype; lanes 3, 4: TT genotype. lane 5, 6: TC genotype.

    Statistical analysis was carried out using statistical package SPSS 22 software. The categorical and continuous data were analyzed using χ2 and t-test, respectively. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed by unconditional logistic regression analysis to determine the association between the variant and the bladder cancer. The statistical level of significance was set as the P < 0.05 level.

    The miR-34b/c rs4938723 t > C polymorphism was successfully genotyped for 136 bladder cancer patients (117 males, 19 females) with an average age of (63.8±12.3) years and 144 controls (134 males, 10 females) with mean age of (64.3±10.2) years. No significant difference was found between the groups regarding age (P = 0.701) and sex (P = 0.076). The genotype and allele frequencies of pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism in bladder cancer patients and controls are shown in Table 1. The results indicated that pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 t > C polymorphism was not associated with the risk of bladder cancer in codominant (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.66-1.78, P = 0.800; OR = 2.13. 95%CI = 0.91-5.01, P = 0.094, TC vs. TT), dominant (OR = 1.22, 95%CI = 0.76-1.95, P = 0.468, TC + CC vs. TT), recessive (OR = 2.04, 95%CI = 0.91-4.60, P = 0.110, CC vs. TT + TC), overdominant (OR = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.59-1.50, P = 0.812, TC vs. TT + CC) and allelic (OR = 1.28, 95%CI = 0.90-1.82, P = 0.181, C vs. T) inheritance model tested. We also calculated adjusted OR and 95%CI for sex and age (Table 1). The findings revealed that the variant was not associated with bladder cancer risk.

    Table  1.  Association between pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 t > C polymorphism and risk of bladder cancer
    rs4938723 Case [n (%)] Control [n (%)] OR (95%CI) P *OR (95%CI) P
    Codominant
    TT 54 (39.7) 64 (44.4) 1.00 - 1.00 -
    TC 64 (47.1) 70 (48.6) 1.08 (0.66–1.78) 0.800 1.06 (0.64–1.77) 0.813
    CC 18 (13.2) 10 (6.9) 2.13 (0.91–5.01) 0.094 2.11 (0.89–4.99) 0.089
    Dominant
    TT 54 (39.7) 64 (44.4) 1.00 - 1.00 -
    TC + CC 82 (60.3) 80 (55.5) 1.22 (0.76–1.95) 0.468 1.19 (0.74–1.93) 0.474
    Recessive
    TT + TC 118 (86.8) 134 (93.1) 1.00 - 1.00 -
    CC 18 (13.2) 10 (6.9) 2.04 (0.91–4.60) 0.110 2.04 (0.90–4.63) 0.086
    Overdominant
    TT + CC 72 (52.9) 74 (51.4) 1.00 - 1.00 -
    TC 64 (47.1) 70 (48.6) 0.94 (0.59–1.50) 0.812 1.09 (0.67–1.75) 0.732
    Allele
    T 172 (41.9) 198 (68.8) 1.00 - - -
    C 100 (58.1) 90 (31.2) 1.28 (0.90–1.82) 0.181 - -
    *adjusted for sex and age
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The association between pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism and clinicopathological characteristics of bladder cancer patients are shown in Table 2. The findings propose a significant association between age and rs4938723 variant so that the TT genotype frequencies was significantly higher in patients with ages > 60 years (48.2%) than that of patients with ages≤60 years (26.4%).

    Table  2.  Association of rs4938723 polymorphism of Pri-miR- 34b/c gene with clinicopathological characteristics of bladder cancer patients.
    (n)
    Factors rs4938723 t > C P-value
    TT TC CC
    Age at diagnosis (years) 0.039
    ≤60 14 14 9
    > 60 40 40 9
    Stage 0.770
    pT2c 0 0 0
    pT3b 2 2 1
    LpT1 14 14 9
    pT2a 6 6 1
    pT2b 2 2 0
    pT3a 3 3 2
    HpT1 12 12 2
    LpTa 9 9 2
    pT4a 1 1 1
    Surgical margin 0.647
    Positive 2 2 0
    Negative 52 52 18
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The genotype rs4938723 polymorphism of pri-miR-34b/c in controls and cases were in HWE (χ2 = 2.483, P = 0.115 and χ2 = 0.019, P = 0.88, respectively).

    In the present study, for the first time, we inspected whether the pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 t > C polymorphism modifies the risk of bladder cancer in a sample from the Iranian population. The results showed that rs4938723 variant of pri-miR-34b/c was not associated with the risk of bladder cancer. As shown in Table 3, several preceding studies have investigated the association between pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism and cancer risk in some populations and various types of cancer with inconsistent findings. It has been shown that rs4938723 variant was not associated with the risk of breast cancer (BC)[37] and retinoblastoma[38]. The variant has been shown to be associated with increased risk of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC)[27] and nasopharyngeal carcinoma[39]. The rs4938723 variant was found to be associated with increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the Chinese[23, 40-41] and Korean populations[42].

    Table  3.  Genotype distribution of miR-34b/c rs4938723 t > C among various studies and association with risk of cancer
    Study Country Cancer type Case/Control Cases Controls Association
    TT TC CC TT TC CC
    Chen et al.[27] China Papillary thyroid carci-noma 787/1, 006 271 402 111 456 451 99 Increased risk
    Li et al.[39] China Nasopharyngeal carci- noma 217/360 82 104 31 168 155 37 Increased risk
    Liu et al.[40] China Hepatocellular carcinoma 164/305 63 80 21 152 141 13 Increased risk
    Xu et al.[23] China Hepatocellular carcinoma 501/548 204 236 62 266 229 54 Increased risk
    Chen et al.[41] China Hepatocellular carcinoma 286/572 102 146 38 272 267 33 Increased risk
    Son et al.[42] Korea Hepatocellular carcinoma 157/201 69 75 13 110 74 17 Increased risk
    Pan et al.[28] China Gastric cancer 197/289 102 76 19 121 137 31 Decreased risk
    Yang et al.[43] China Gastric cancer 419/402 193 186 40 156 184 62 Decreased risk
    Wu et al.[44] China Gastric cancer 897/992 405 396 92 476 430 84 No association
    Zhang et al.[45] China Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1, 109/1, 275 489 536 84 569 573 133 Decreased risk
    Zhu et al.[24] China Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 237/274 113 99 25 122 122 30 No association
    Oh et al.[46] Korea Colorectal cancer 545/428 272 233 40 216 171 41 No association
    Gao et al.[47] China Colorectal cancer 347/488 175 144 28 216 210 62 Decreased risk
    Yuan et al.[32] China Cervical cancer 328/568 117 157 36 242 258 68 Increased risk
    Zhang et al.[20] China Renal cell carcinoma 710/760 302 324 84 352 344 64 Increased risk
    Carvalho et al.[38] Brazil Retinoblastoma 130/105 52 64 14 45 44 16 No association
    Sanaei et al.[37] Iran Breast cancer 263/221 125 115 23 100 106 15 No association
    Hashemi et al.[48] Iran Prostate cancer 151/152 85 56 10 109 38 5 Increased risk
    Tong et al.[49] China Childhood ALL 570/673 245 281 35 301 296 76 Decreases risk
    Hashemi et al.[50] Iran Childhood ALL 110/120 77 31 2 62 52 6 Decreased risk
    Current study Iran Bladder cancer 136/144 54 64 18 64 70 10 No association
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Pan et al. and Yang et al. have found that pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 variants significantly decreased the risk of gastric cancer (GC) in Chinese population[28, 43]. On the other hand, the findings of Wu et al. did not support an association between the variant and risk of GC in Chinese population[44]. Zhang et al. findings revealed that rs4938723 variant significantly decreased the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the Chinese population[45]. While, Zhu et al. has found no significant association between the variant and risk of ESCC in the Chinese population[24].

    Oh et al. have found no significant association between rs4938723 variant and colorectal cancer (CRC) in Korean population, while Gao et al. reported that this variant decrease the risk of CRC in Chinese population[46-47]. The rs4938723 variant have been shown to be associated with increased risk of cervical cancer[32], renal cell carcinoma[20] and prostate cancer[48].

    Tong et al.[49] and Hashemi et al.[50] reported that the rs4938723 variant significantly decreases the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

    There is no clear reason for the inconsistent findings regarding the association between pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 variant and cancer risk. Ethnic, genetic, and/or environmental factors as well as gene-diet interaction may interact in various modes to either increase or decrease the risk of various cancers in different regions.

    In summary, our findings did not support an association between rs4938723 polymorphism in the promoter region of pri-miR-34b/c and the risk of bladder cancer in a sample from the Iranian population. Further large-scale studies with diverse ethnicities are warranted to reveal the impact of rs4938723 on bladder cancer.

    This paper was funded by a research grant (#8067) from Zahedan University of Medical Sciences.

  • [1]
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(1): 7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332
    [2]
    Shiels MS, Gibson T, Sampson J, et al. Cigarette smoking prior to first cancer and risk of second smoking-associated cancers among survivors of bladder, kidney, head and neck, and stage Ⅰ lung cancers[J]. J ClinOncol, 2014, 32(35): 3989-3995. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.8220
    [3]
    Vermeulen SH, Hanum N, Grotenhuis AJ, et al. Recurrent urinary tract infection and risk of bladder cancer in the Nijmegen bladder cancer study[J]. Br J Cancer, 2015, 112(3): 594-600. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.601
    [4]
    Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer[J]. EurUrol, 2013, 63(2): 234-241. http://www.tandfonline.com/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0005&dbid=8&doi=10.1080%2F14737159.2018.1453808&key=22877502
    [5]
    Giedl J, Rogler A, Wild A, et al. TERT core promotor mutations in early-onset bladder cancer[J]. J Cancer, 2016, 7(8): 915- 920. doi: 10.7150/jca.15006
    [6]
    Sankhwar M, Sankhwar SN, Bansal SK, et al. Polymorphisms in the XPC gene affect urinary bladder cancer risk: a casecontrol study, meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 27018. doi: 10.1038/srep27018
    [7]
    Hua Q, Lv X, Gu X, et al. Genetic variants in lncRNA H19 are associated with the risk of bladder cancer in a Chinese population[J]. Mutagenesis, 2016, 31(5): 531-538. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gew018
    [8]
    Aben KK, Witjes JA, Schoenberg MP, et al. Familial aggregation of urothelial cell carcinoma[J]. Int J Cancer, 2002, 98(2): 274-278. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0215
    [9]
    Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function[J]. Cell, 2004, 116(2): 281-297. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5
    [10]
    Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs-microRNAs with a role in cancer[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2006, 6(4): 259-269. doi: 10.1038/nrc1840
    [11]
    He L, Thomson JM, Hemann MT, et al. A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene[J]. Nature, 2005, 435(7043): 828-833. doi: 10.1038/nature03552
    [12]
    Voorhoeve PM, le Sage C, Schrier M, et al. A genetic screen implicates miRNA-372 and miRNA-373 as oncogenes in testicular germ cell tumors[J]. Cell, 2006, 124(6): 1169-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.037
    [13]
    Li YQ, Lu JH, Bao XM, et al. MiR-24 functions as a tumor suppressor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma through targeting FSCN1[J]. J ExpClin Cancer Res, 2015, 34(1): 130. doi: 10.1186/s13046-015-0242-6
    [14]
    Ruoming W, Zhen Y, Tengteng Z, et al. Tumor suppressor microRNA-31 inhibits gastric carcinogenesis by targeting Smad4 and SGPP2[J]. Cancer Gene Ther, 2015, 22(12): 564- 572. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2015.41
    [15]
    Glover AR, Zhao JT, Gill AJ, et al. MicroRNA-7 as a tumor suppressor and novel therapeutic for adrenocortical carcinoma[J]. Oncotarget, 2015, 6(34): 36675-36688. http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4742203/
    [16]
    Ryan BM, Robles AI, Harris CC. Genetic variation in microRNA networks: the implications for cancer research[J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2010, 10(6): 389-402. doi: 10.1038/nrc2867
    [17]
    Zhu S, Wu H, Wu F, et al. MicroRNA-21 targets tumor suppressor genes in invasion and metastasis[J]. Cell Res, 2008, 18(3): 350-359. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/85240X/200803/26811668.html
    [18]
    Buscaglia LE, Li Y. Apoptosis and the target genes of microRNA-21[J]. Chin J Cancer, 2011, 30(6): 371-380. doi: 10.5732/cjc
    [19]
    Hashemi M, Sheybani-Nasab M, Naderi M, et al. Association of functional polymorphism at the miR-502-binding site in the 3′ untranslated region of the SETD8 gene with risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a preliminary report[J]. TumourBiol, 2014, 35(10): 10375-10379. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2359-1
    [20]
    Zhang S, Qian J, Cao Q, et al. A potentially functional polymorphism in the promoter region of miR-34b/c is associated with renal cell cancer risk in a Chinese population[J]. Mutagenesis, 2014, 29(2): 149-154. doi: 10.1093/mutage/geu001
    [21]
    Bossard P, Zaret KS. GATA transcription factors as potentiators of gut endoderm differentiation[J]. Development, 1998, 125(24): 4909-4917. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/9811575
    [22]
    Chou J, Provot S, Werb Z. GATA3 in development and cancer differentiation: cells GATA have it![J]. J Cell Physiol, 2010, 222(1): 42-49. doi: 10.1002/jcp.v222:1
    [23]
    Xu Y, Liu L, Liu J, et al. A potentially functional polymorphism in the promoter region of miR-34b/c is associated with an increased risk for primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Int J Cancer, 2011, 128(2): 412-417. doi: 10.1002/ijc.v128:2
    [24]
    Zhu J, Yang L, You W, et al. Genetic variation in miR-100 rs1834306 is associated with decreased risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Kazakh patients in northwest China[J]. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2015, 8(6): 7332-7340. http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4525967
    [25]
    Wang FJ, Ding Y, Mao YY, et al. Associations between hsamiR-603 polymorphism, lifestyle-related factors and colorectal cancer risk[J]. Cancer Biomark, 2014, 14(4): 225-231. doi: 10.3233/CBM-140395
    [26]
    Ji TX, Zhi C, Guo XG, et al. MiR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism significantly decreases the risk of digestive tract cancer: meta-analysis[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2015, 16(14): 6099-6104. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.14.6099
    [27]
    Chen P, Sun R, Pu Y, et al. Pri-Mir-34b/C and Tp-53 polymorphisms are associated with the susceptibility of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a case-control study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015, 94(38): e1536. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001536
    [28]
    Pan XM, Sun RF, Li ZH, et al. Pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism is associated with a decreased risk of gastric cancer[J]. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers, 2015, 19(4): 198-202. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2014.0287
    [29]
    Nowakowska M, Płuciennik E, Wujcicka WI, et al. The correlation analysis of WWOX expression and cancer related genes in neuroblastoma-a real time RT-PCR study[J]. Acta Biochim Pol, 2014, 61(1): 91-97. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/24455756
    [30]
    Tao T, Chen S, Xu B, et al. Association between hsa-miR-34b/c rs4938723 T > C promoter polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 6, 036 cases and 6, 204 controls[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2014, 26(3): 315-322. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgazyj201403017
    [31]
    Liang TJ, Liu HJ, Zhao XQ, et al. Lack of association of MiR- 34b/c polymorphism (rs4938723) with hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e68588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068588
    [32]
    Yuan F, Sun R, Chen P, et al. Combined analysis of pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 and TP53 Arg72Pro with cervical cancer risk[J]. Tumour Biol, 2016, 37(5): 6267-6273. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4467-y
    [33]
    Tong N, Chu H, Wang M, et al. Pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism contributes to acute lymphoblastic leukemia susceptibility in Chinese children[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2016, 57(6): 1436-1441. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1092528
    [34]
    Bensen JT, Tse CK, Nyante SJ, et al. Association of germline microRNA SNPs in pre-miRNA flanking region and breast cancer risk and survival: the Carolina Breast Cancer Study[J]. Cancer Causes Control, 2013, 24(6): 1099-1109. doi: 10.1007/s10552-013-0187-z
    [35]
    Hashemi M, Bizhani F, Danesh H, et al. MiR-608 rs4919510 C > G polymorphism increased the risk of bladder cancer in an Iranian population[J]. Aims Genet, 2016, 3(4): 212-218. doi: 10.3934/genet.2016.4.212
    [36]
    Hashemi M, Hanafi Bojd H, EskandariNasab E, et al. Association of adiponectin rs1501299 and rs266729 gene polymorphisms with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Hepat Mon, 2013, 13(5): e9527. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3734897/
    [37]
    Sanaei S, Hashemi M, Rezaei M, et al. Evaluation of the primiR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism and its association with breast cancer risk[J]. Biomed Rep, 2016, 5(1): 125-129.
    [38]
    Carvalho IN, Reis AH, Dos Santos AC, et al. A polymorphism in mir-34b/c as a potential biomarker for early onset of hereditary retinoblastoma[J]. Cancer Biomark, 2017, 18(3): 313-317. doi: 10.3233/CBM-160248
    [39]
    Li L, Wu J, Sima X, et al. Interactions of miR-34b/c and TP-53 polymorphisms on the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Tumour Biol, 2013, 34(3): 1919-1923. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0736-9
    [40]
    Liu CJ, Ma XW, Zhang XJ, et al. pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma risk: a case-control study in a Chinese population[J]. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet, 2017, 8(1): 1-7. http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC5344989/
    [41]
    Chen LL, Shen Y, Zhang JB, et al. Association between polymorphisms in the promoter region of pri-miR-34b/c and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Genet Mol Res, 2016, 15(4). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27808368
    [42]
    Son MS, Jang MJ, Jeon YJ, et al. Promoter polymorphisms of pri-miR-34b/c are associated with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gene, 2013, 524(2): 156-160. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.04.042
    [43]
    Yang C, Ma X, Liu D, et al. Promoter polymorphisms of miR- 34b/c are associated with risk of gastric cancer in a Chinese population[J]. Tumour Biol, 2014, 35(12): 12545-12554. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2574-9
    [44]
    Wu Y, Jia Z, Cao D, et al. Predictive value of MiR-219-1, MiR- 938, MiR-34b/c, and MiR-218 polymorphisms for gastric cancer susceptibility and prognosis[J]. Dis Markers, 2017, 20174731891.
    [45]
    Zhang J, Huang X, Xiao J, et al. Pri-miR-124 rs531564 and primiR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphisms are associated with decreased risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese populations[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(6): e100055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100055
    [46]
    Oh J, Kim JW, Lee BE, et al. Polymorphisms of the pri-miR- 34b/c promoter and TP53 codon 72 are associated with risk of colorectal cancer[J]. Oncol Rep, 2014, 31(2): 995-1002. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2926
    [47]
    Gao LB, Li LJ, Pan XM, et al. A genetic variant in the promoter region of miR-34b/c is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer[J]. Biol Chem, 2013, 394(3): 415-420. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23183747
    [48]
    Hashemi M, Danesh H, Bizhani F, et al. Pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism increased the risk of prostate cancer[J]. Cancer Biomark, 2017, 18(2): 155-159. doi: 10.3233/CBM-160058
    [49]
    Tong N, Chu H, Wang M, et al. Pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism contributes to acute lymphoblastic leukemia susceptibility in Chinese children[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2015, 57(6): 1436-1441. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26380954
    [50]
    Hashemi M, Bahari G, Naderi M, et al. Pri-miR-34b/c rs4938723 polymorphism is associated with the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Cancer Genet, 2016, 209(11): 493-496. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2016.09.009

Catalog

    Figures(1)  /  Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3384) PDF downloads (42) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return