4.6

CiteScore

2.2

Impact Factor
  • ISSN 1674-8301
  • CN 32-1810/R
Anna Karolina Zuk, Xuesong Wen, Stephen Dilworth, Dong Li, Lucy Ghali. Modeling and validating three dimensional human normal cervix and cervical cancer tissues in vitro[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2017, 31(3): 240-247. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20160150
Citation: Anna Karolina Zuk, Xuesong Wen, Stephen Dilworth, Dong Li, Lucy Ghali. Modeling and validating three dimensional human normal cervix and cervical cancer tissues in vitro[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2017, 31(3): 240-247. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20160150

Modeling and validating three dimensional human normal cervix and cervical cancer tissues in vitro

Funds: 

This work was supported by the Middlesex University, particularly in the award of a Postgraduate Research Studentship that provided the necessary financial support for this research

More Information
  • Received Date: November 14, 2016
  • The use of three dimensional in vitro systems in cancer research is a promising path for developing effective anticancer therapies. The aim of this study was to engineer a functional 3-D in vitro model of normal and cancerous cervical tissue. Normal epithelial and immortalized cervical epithelial carcinoma cell lines were used to construct 3-D artificial normal cervical and cervical cancerous tissues. De-epidermised dermis (DED) was used as a scaffold for both models. Morphological analyses were conducted by using hematoxylin and eosin staining and characteristics of the models were studied by analyzing the expression of different structural cytokeratins and differential protein marker MAX dimerisation protein 1 (Mad1) using immunohistochemical technique. Haematoxylin and eosin staining results showed that normal cervical tissue had multi epithelial layers while cancerous cervical tissue showed dysplastic changes. Immunohistochemistry staining revealed that for normal cervix model cytokeratin 10 was expressed in the upper stratified layer of the epithelium while cytokeratin 5 was expressed mainly in the middle and basal layer. Cytokeratin 19 was weakly expressed in a few basal cells. Cervical cancer model showed cytokeratin 19 expression in different epithelial layers and weak or no expression for cytokeratin 5 and cytokeratin 10. Mad1 expression was detected in some suprabasal cells. The 3-D in vitro models showed stratified epithelial layers and expressed the same types and patterns of differentiation marker proteins as seen in corresponding in vivo tissue in either normal cervical or cervical cancerous tissue. These findings imply that they can serve as functional normal and cervical cancer models.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Chen Li, Kerui Wang, Xingfeng Mao, Xiuxiu Liu, Yingmei Lu. Upregulated inwardly rectifying K+ current-mediated hypoactivity of parvalbumin interneuron underlies autism-like deficits in Bod1-deficient mice[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.38.20240394
    [2]Qian Sun, Yusi Hu, Saiyue Deng, Yanyu Xiong, Zhili Huang. A visualization pipeline for in vivo two-photon volumetric astrocytic calcium imaging[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2022, 36(5): 358-367. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.36.20220099
    [3]Huang Lei, Lu Qun, Du Jiangbo, Lv Hong, Tao Shiyao, Chen Shiyao, Li Xiuzhu, Han Xiumei, Zhou Kun, Xu Bo, Liu Xiaoyu, Ma Hongxia, Xia Yankai, Jin Guangfu, Shen Hongbing, Ling Xiufeng, Hu Zhibin, Tan Jichun, Diao Feiyang. Cumulative live birth rates of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection after multiple complete cycles in China[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2020, 34(5): 361-368. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.34.20200035
    [4]Wu Fang, Liu Feng, Guan Yichun, Du Jiangbo, Tan Jichun, Lv Hong, Lu Qun, Tao Shiyao, Huang Lei, Zhou Kun, Xia Yankai, Wang Xinru, Shen Hongbing, Ling Xiufeng, Diao Feiyang, Hu Zhibin, Jin Guangfu. A nomogram predicting clinical pregnancy in the first fresh embryo transfer for women undergoing in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2019, 33(6): 422-429. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.33.20190065
    [5]Huanqiang Wang, Congying Yang, Siyuan Wang, Tian Wang, Jingling Han, Kai Wei, Fucun Liu, Jida Xu, Xianzhen Peng, Jianming Wang. Cell-free plasma hypermethylated CASZ1, CDH13 and ING2 are promising biomarkers of esophageal cancer[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2018, 32(6): 424-433. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.32.20170065
    [6]Young-Joo Yi, S. Kamala-Kannan, Jeong-Muk Lim, Byung-Taek Oh, Sang-Myeong Lee. Effects of difructose dianhydride (DFA)-IV on in vitro fertilization in pigs[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2017, 31(5): 453-461. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20160115
    [7]Seo-jin Park, Kyoung-Ha So, Sang-Hwan Hyun. Effect of zeaxanthin on porcine embryonic development during in vitro maturation[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2017, 31(2): 154-161. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20160079
    [8]Shengfa Ni, Lingxiang Liu, Yongqian Shu. Sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2012, 26(4): 260-267. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.26.20120016
    [9]Amit Kumar Sharma, Rajeev Kumar Tiwari, Mulayam Singh Gaur. Three dimensional structure prediction and proton nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of toxic pesticides in human blood plasma[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2012, 26(3): 170-184. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.26.20110132
    [10]Xiaojun Chen, Jie Jiang, Hongbing Shen, Zhibin Hu. Genetic susceptibility of cervical cancer[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2011, 25(3): 155-164. DOI: 10.1016/S1674-8301(11)60020-1
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. Izadifar Z, Cotton J, Chen S, et al. Mucus production, host-microbiome interactions, hormone sensitivity, and innate immune responses modeled in human cervix chips. Nat Commun, 2024, 15(1): 4578. DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-48910-0
    2. Lopez I, Truskey GA. Multi-cellular engineered living systems to assess reproductive toxicology. Reprod Toxicol, 2024, 127: 108609. DOI:10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108609
    3. Kurmyshkina OV, Bogdanova AA, Kovchur PI, et al. RNA Sequencing and Cell Models of Virus-Associated Cancer (Review). Sovrem Tekhnologii Med, 2022, 14(1): 64-80. DOI:10.17691/stm2022.14.1.07
    4. Edwards VL, McComb E, Gleghorn JP, et al. Three-dimensional models of the cervicovaginal epithelia to study host-microbiome interactions and sexually transmitted infections. Pathog Dis, 2022, 80(1): ftac026. DOI:10.1093/femspd/ftac026
    5. Abbaspour A, Casillas AL, McGregor SM, et al. Bioengineering Approaches to Improve Gynecological Cancer Outcomes. Curr Opin Biomed Eng, 2022, 22: 100384. DOI:10.1016/j.cobme.2022.100384
    6. Francés-Herrero E, Lopez R, Hellström M, et al. Bioengineering trends in female reproduction: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update, 2022, 28(6): 798-837. DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmac025
    7. Shafaat S, Mangir N, Chapple C, et al. A physiologically relevant, estradiol-17β [E2]-responsive in vitro tissue-engineered model of the vaginal epithelium for vaginal tissue research. Neurourol Urodyn, 2022, 41(4): 905-917. DOI:10.1002/nau.24908
    8. Zubizarreta ME, Xiao S. Bioengineering models of female reproduction. Biodes Manuf, 2020, 3(3): 237-251. DOI:10.1007/s42242-020-00082-8
    9. McKinnon KE, Sensharma R, Williams C, et al. Development of human ectocervical tissue models with physiologic endocrine and paracrine signaling†. Biol Reprod, 2020, 103(3): 497-507. DOI:10.1093/biolre/ioaa068
    10. Gargus ES, Rogers HB, McKinnon KE, et al. Engineered reproductive tissues. Nat Biomed Eng, 2020, 4(4): 381-393. DOI:10.1038/s41551-020-0525-x

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2882) PDF downloads (262) Cited by(10)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return