4.6

CiteScore

2.2

Impact Factor
  • ISSN 1674-8301
  • CN 32-1810/R
Shouyong Gu, Xiaofei An, Liang Fang, Xiaomin Zhang, Chunyan Zhang, Jingling Wang, Qilan Liu, Yanfang Zhang, Yongyue Wei, Zhibin Hu, Feng Chen, Hongbing Shen. Risk factors and long-term health consequences of macrosomia: a prospective study in Jiangsu Province, China[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2012, 26(4): 235-240. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.26.20120037
Citation: Shouyong Gu, Xiaofei An, Liang Fang, Xiaomin Zhang, Chunyan Zhang, Jingling Wang, Qilan Liu, Yanfang Zhang, Yongyue Wei, Zhibin Hu, Feng Chen, Hongbing Shen. Risk factors and long-term health consequences of macrosomia: a prospective study in Jiangsu Province, China[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2012, 26(4): 235-240. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.26.20120037

Risk factors and long-term health consequences of macrosomia: a prospective study in Jiangsu Province, China

Funds: 

Jiangsu Birth Defects Intervention Program (No. JS200302) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK2008501)

More Information
  • Received Date: April 09, 2012
  • We sought to determine risk factors associated with fetal macrosomia and to explore the long-term consequence of infant macrosomia at the age of 7 years. A prospective population based cohort study was designed to examine the associations between maternal and perinatal characteristics and the risk of macrosomia. A nested case-control study was conducted to explore the long-term health consequence of infant macrosomia. The mean maternal age of the macrosomia group was 24.74±3.32 years, which is slightly older than that in the control group (24.35±3.14 years, P = 0.000). The mean maternal body mass index (BMI) at early pregnancy was 22.75±2.81 kg/m2, which was also higher than that in the control group (21.76±2.59 kg/m2, P = 0.000). About 64.6% of macrosomic neonates were males, compared with 51.0% in the control group (P=0.000). Compared with women with normal weight (BMI: 18.5-23.9 kg/m2), women who were overweight (BMI: 24-27.9 kg/m2) or obese (BMI≥28 kg/m2), respectively, had a 1.69-fold (P = 0.000) and a 1.49-fold (P = 0.000) increased risks of having a neonate with macrosomia, while light weight (BMI<18.5 kg/m2) women had an approximately 50% reduction of the risk. Furthermore, macrosomia infant had a 1.52-fold and 1.50-fold risk, respectively, of developing overweight or obesity at the age of 7 years (P = 0.001 and P = 0.000). Older maternal age, higher maternal BMI at early pregnancy and male gender were independent risk factors of macrosomia. Macrosomic infant was associated with an increased predisposition to develop overweight or obesity at the beginning of their childhood.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Izzatullo Ziyoyiddin o`g`li Abdullaev, Ulugbek Gapparjanovich Gayibov, Sirojiddin Zoirovich Omonturdiev, Sobirova Fotima Azamjonovna, Sabina Narimanovna Gayibova, Takhir Fatikhovich Aripov. Molecular pathways in cardiovascular disease under hypoxia: Mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic targets[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.38.20240387
    [2]Fangyuan Li, Yaohui Wang, Xiaochun Ping, Jiani C. Yin, Fufeng Wang, Xian Zhang, Xiang Li, Jing Zhai, Lizong Shen. Molecular evolution of intestinal-type early gastric cancer according to Correa cascade[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.38.20240118
    [3]Zheyue Wang, Qi Tang, Bende Liu, Wenqing Zhang, Yufeng Chen, Ningfei Ji, Yan Peng, Xiaohui Yang, Daixun Cui, Weiyu Kong, Xiaojun Tang, Tingting Yang, Mingshun Zhang, Xinxia Chang, Jin Zhu, Mao Huang, Zhenqing Feng. A SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody discovery by single cell sequencing and molecular modeling[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2023, 37(3): 166-178. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.36.20220221
    [4]Misevic Gradimir. Single-cell omics analyses with single molecular detection: challenges and perspectives[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2021, 35(4): 264-276. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.35.20210026
    [5]Yuan Huang, Peng Quan, Yongwei Wang, Dongsheng Zhang, Mingwan Zhang, Rui Li, Nan Jiang. Host-guest interaction of β-cyclodextrin with isomeric ursolic acid and oleanolic acid: physicochemical characterization and molecular modeling study[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2017, 31(5): 395-407. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.31.20160073
    [6]Salam Pradeep Singh, Chitta Ranjan Deb, Sharif Udin Ahmed, Yenisetti Saratchandra, Bolin Kumar Konwar. Molecular docking simulation analysis of the interaction of dietary flavonols with heat shock protein 90[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2016, 30(1): 67-74. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.30.20130158
    [7]Usman Sumo Friend Tambunan, Rizky Archintya Rachmania, Arli Aditya Parikesit. In silico modification of oseltamivir as neuraminidase inhibitor of influenza A virus subtype H1N1[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2015, 29(2): 150-159. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.29.20130024
    [8]Talambedu Usha, Sushil Kumar Middha, Arvind Kumar Goyal, Mahesh Karthik, DA Manoj, Syed Faizan, Peyush Goyal, HP Prashanth, Veena Pande. Molecular docking studies of anti-cancerous candidates in Hippophae rhamnoides and Hippophae salicifolia[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2014, 28(5): 406-415. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.28.20130110
    [9]Meilin Wang, Haiyan Chu, Zhengdong Zhang, Qingyi Wei. Molecular epidemiology of DNA repair gene polymorphisms and head and neck cancer[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2013, 27(3): 179-192. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.27.20130034
    [10]Daniel G Rosen, Zhihong Zhang, Weiwei Shan, Jinsong Liu. Morphological and molecular basis of ovarian serous carcinoma[J]. The Journal of Biomedical Research, 2010, 24(4): 257-263. DOI: 10.1016/S1674-8301(10)60036-X
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(15)

    1. Antonelli R, Forconi V, Molesti E, et al. A validated and standardized pseudotyped microneutralization assay as a safe and powerful tool to measure LASSA virus neutralising antibodies for vaccine development and comparison. F1000Res, 2024, 13: 534. DOI:10.12688/f1000research.149578.2
    2. Nahar N, Nazmul Hasan Zilani M, Biswas P, et al. Profiling of secondary metabolite and evaluation of anti-diabetic potency of Crotalaria quinquefolia (L): In-vitro, in-vivo, and in-silico approaches. Saudi Pharm J, 2024, 32(1): 101887. DOI:10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101887
    3. Nur Kabidul Azam M, Biswas P, Mohaimenul Islam Tareq M, et al. Identification of antidiabetic inhibitors from Allophylus villosus and Mycetia sinensis by targeting α-glucosidase and PPAR-γ: In-vitro, in-vivo, and computational evidence. Saudi Pharm J, 2024, 32(1): 101884. DOI:10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101884
    4. Rahman MH, Al Azad S, Uddin MF, et al. WGS-based screening of the co-chaperone protein DjlA-induced curved DNA binding protein A (CbpA) from a new multidrug-resistant zoonotic mastitis-causing Klebsiella pneumoniae strain: a novel molecular target of selective flavonoids. Mol Divers, 2023. DOI:10.1007/s11030-023-10731-6. Online ahead of print
    5. Akash S, Bibi S, Biswas P, et al. Revolutionizing anti-cancer drug discovery against breast cancer and lung cancer by modification of natural genistein: an advanced computational and drug design approach. Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1228865. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1228865
    6. Sharif MA, Khan AM, Salekeen R, et al. Phyllanthus emblica (Amla) methanolic extract regulates multiple checkpoints in 15-lipoxygenase mediated inflammopathies: Computational simulation and in vitro evidence. Saudi Pharm J, 2023, 31(8): 101681. DOI:10.1016/j.jsps.2023.06.014
    7. Biswas P, Bibi S, Yousafi Q, et al. Study of MDM2 as Prognostic Biomarker in Brain-LGG Cancer and Bioactive Phytochemicals Inhibit the p53-MDM2 Pathway: A Computational Drug Development Approach. Molecules, 2023, 28(7): 2977. DOI:10.3390/molecules28072977
    8. Jabin A, Uddin MF, Al Azad S, et al. Target-specificity of different amyrin subunits in impeding HCV influx mechanism inside the human cells considering the quantum tunnel profiles and molecular strings of the CD81 receptor: a combined in silico and in vivo study. In Silico Pharmacol, 2023, 11(1): 8. DOI:10.1007/s40203-023-00144-6
    9. Arefin A, Gage MC. Metformin, Empagliflozin, and Their Combination Modulate Ex-Vivo Macrophage Inflammatory Gene Expression. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(5): 4785. DOI:10.3390/ijms24054785
    10. Morshed AKMH, Al Azad S, Mia MAR, et al. Oncoinformatic screening of the gene clusters involved in the HER2-positive breast cancer formation along with the in silico pharmacodynamic profiling of selective long-chain omega-3 fatty acids as the metastatic antagonists. Mol Divers, 2023, 27(6): 2651-2672. DOI:10.1007/s11030-022-10573-8
    11. Dey D, Biswas P, Paul P, et al. Natural flavonoids effectively block the CD81 receptor of hepatocytes and inhibit HCV infection: a computational drug development approach. Mol Divers, 2023, 27(3): 1309-1322. DOI:10.1007/s11030-022-10491-9
    12. Islam S, Farjana M, Uddin MR, et al. Molecular identification, characterization, and antagonistic activity profiling of Bacillus cereus LOCK 1002 along with the in-silico analysis of its presumptive bacteriocins. J Adv Vet Anim Res, 2022, 9(4): 663-675. DOI:10.5455/javar.2022.i635
    13. Biswas P, Dey D, Biswas PK, et al. A Comprehensive Analysis and Anti-Cancer Activities of Quercetin in ROS-Mediated Cancer and Cancer Stem Cells. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(19): 11746. DOI:10.3390/ijms231911746
    14. Ferdausi N, Islam S, Rimti FH, et al. Point-specific interactions of isovitexin with the neighboring amino acid residues of the hACE2 receptor as a targeted therapeutic agent in suppressing the SARS-CoV-2 influx mechanism. J Adv Vet Anim Res, 2022, 9(2): 230-240. DOI:10.5455/javar.2022.i588
    15. Dey D, Hasan MM, Biswas P, et al. Investigating the Anticancer Potential of Salvicine as a Modulator of Topoisomerase II and ROS Signaling Cascade. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 899009. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.899009

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(15)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return